[問卦] 亞泥賺幾百億只要年繳不到八萬??消失
根據 #1P4oPNB6 的文章寫
亞泥賺了四十年每年只要繳七萬九千六百八十六元的礦區稅
本以為採擴權只是幫政府挖礦增加國庫
所以才讓他特許經營抽%,
沒想到國庫每年只增加七萬九千六百八十六元??
而亞泥卻賺了幾百億,
為什麼只有亞泥能採礦??
國民黨遺毒,民進黨也不能排毒,時代力量好像也沒消沒息~~
只能讓他這樣挖賺暴利嗎??
賺這麼多該不會也喊經營困難沒利益!!連稅都不用繳吧??
開第一槍提出問題的人出意外不見了,
以後山一座一座不見也不知道了,
現在只能等下一個20年讓共產黨來決解嗎??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.165.195.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497152698.A.931.html
推
06/11 11:45, , 1F
06/11 11:45, 1F
噓
06/11 11:45, , 2F
06/11 11:45, 2F
→
06/11 11:45, , 3F
06/11 11:45, 3F
推
06/11 11:46, , 4F
06/11 11:46, 4F
推
06/11 11:47, , 5F
06/11 11:47, 5F
推
06/11 11:47, , 6F
06/11 11:47, 6F
推
06/11 11:48, , 7F
06/11 11:48, 7F
推
06/11 11:48, , 8F
06/11 11:48, 8F
所以是「花蓮縣礦石開採特別稅自治條例」決定開採的嗎??
推
06/11 11:48, , 9F
06/11 11:48, 9F
→
06/11 11:48, , 10F
06/11 11:48, 10F
→
06/11 11:48, , 11F
06/11 11:48, 11F
推
06/11 11:49, , 12F
06/11 11:49, 12F
推
06/11 11:49, , 13F
06/11 11:49, 13F
真的很安靜
推
06/11 11:50, , 14F
06/11 11:50, 14F
推
06/11 11:50, , 15F
06/11 11:50, 15F
→
06/11 11:50, , 16F
06/11 11:50, 16F
→
06/11 11:50, , 17F
06/11 11:50, 17F
推
06/11 11:51, , 18F
06/11 11:51, 18F
→
06/11 11:52, , 19F
06/11 11:52, 19F
→
06/11 11:52, , 20F
06/11 11:52, 20F
推
06/11 11:52, , 21F
06/11 11:52, 21F
→
06/11 11:53, , 22F
06/11 11:53, 22F
推
06/11 11:53, , 23F
06/11 11:53, 23F
推
06/11 11:55, , 24F
06/11 11:55, 24F
推
06/11 11:55, , 25F
06/11 11:55, 25F
推
06/11 11:55, , 26F
06/11 11:55, 26F
推
06/11 11:56, , 27F
06/11 11:56, 27F
→
06/11 11:56, , 28F
06/11 11:56, 28F
推
06/11 11:57, , 29F
06/11 11:57, 29F
這方面應該可以挖到更多八卦!!!
推
06/11 11:58, , 30F
06/11 11:58, 30F
推
06/11 11:58, , 31F
06/11 11:58, 31F
→
06/11 11:59, , 32F
06/11 11:59, 32F
推
06/11 12:01, , 33F
06/11 12:01, 33F
這也是我想問的~~那麼大塊年繳不到八萬~~比房屋稅還便宜~~
推
06/11 12:02, , 34F
06/11 12:02, 34F
還有 31 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
06/11 13:31, , 66F
06/11 13:31, 66F
推
06/11 13:35, , 67F
06/11 13:35, 67F
→
06/11 13:37, , 68F
06/11 13:37, 68F
推
06/11 13:40, , 69F
06/11 13:40, 69F
推
06/11 13:46, , 70F
06/11 13:46, 70F
推
06/11 13:47, , 71F
06/11 13:47, 71F
推
06/11 13:56, , 72F
06/11 13:56, 72F
推
06/11 13:57, , 73F
06/11 13:57, 73F
噓
06/11 13:59, , 74F
06/11 13:59, 74F
推
06/11 14:01, , 75F
06/11 14:01, 75F
推
06/11 14:10, , 76F
06/11 14:10, 76F
噓
06/11 14:18, , 77F
06/11 14:18, 77F
推
06/11 14:18, , 78F
06/11 14:18, 78F
推
06/11 14:27, , 79F
06/11 14:27, 79F
→
06/11 14:28, , 80F
06/11 14:28, 80F
→
06/11 14:40, , 81F
06/11 14:40, 81F
推
06/11 14:45, , 82F
06/11 14:45, 82F
→
06/11 14:45, , 83F
06/11 14:45, 83F
→
06/11 14:46, , 84F
06/11 14:46, 84F
推
06/11 15:07, , 85F
06/11 15:07, 85F
推
06/11 15:12, , 86F
06/11 15:12, 86F
推
06/11 15:48, , 87F
06/11 15:48, 87F
推
06/11 15:50, , 88F
06/11 15:50, 88F
推
06/11 17:00, , 89F
06/11 17:00, 89F
推
06/11 17:04, , 90F
06/11 17:04, 90F
→
06/11 17:13, , 91F
06/11 17:13, 91F
推
06/11 18:03, , 92F
06/11 18:03, 92F
推
06/11 18:07, , 93F
06/11 18:07, 93F
推
06/11 18:10, , 94F
06/11 18:10, 94F
推
06/11 18:26, , 95F
06/11 18:26, 95F
→
06/11 18:28, , 96F
06/11 18:28, 96F
推
06/11 18:28, , 97F
06/11 18:28, 97F
→
06/11 18:31, , 98F
06/11 18:31, 98F
推
06/11 19:39, , 99F
06/11 19:39, 99F
推
06/11 20:29, , 100F
06/11 20:29, 100F
→
06/11 21:48, , 101F
06/11 21:48, 101F
推
06/12 08:40, , 102F
06/12 08:40, 102F
推
06/12 09:12, , 103F
06/12 09:12, 103F
推
06/12 13:02, , 104F
06/12 13:02, 104F
推
06/12 14:09, , 105F
06/12 14:09, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):