反正核電要用不用的
占了發電量也不多
又花一堆錢在那邊維修
還租貴到爆的機器
核電ㄧ次停
火力發電全開
所有核電經費全砸在火力發電的污染處理
這樣搞不行嗎
有沒有專家可以解釋
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.166.184.146
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1496506529.A.89F.html
推
06/04 00:15, , 1F
06/04 00:15, 1F
推
06/04 00:16, , 2F
06/04 00:16, 2F
→
06/04 00:16, , 3F
06/04 00:16, 3F
噓
06/04 00:16, , 4F
06/04 00:16, 4F
你有看文章?
※ 編輯: s58565254 (118.166.184.146), 06/04/2017 00:17:20
→
06/04 00:17, , 5F
06/04 00:17, 5F
推
06/04 00:17, , 6F
06/04 00:17, 6F
噓
06/04 00:18, , 7F
06/04 00:18, 7F
→
06/04 00:18, , 8F
06/04 00:18, 8F
噓
06/04 00:20, , 9F
06/04 00:20, 9F
誰他媽在意全球暖化?
→
06/04 00:20, , 10F
06/04 00:20, 10F
→
06/04 00:21, , 11F
06/04 00:21, 11F
所以全部拿去處理污染跟核電比差多少?
※ 編輯: s58565254 (118.166.184.146), 06/04/2017 00:22:28
→
06/04 00:21, , 12F
06/04 00:21, 12F
※ 編輯: s58565254 (118.166.184.146), 06/04/2017 00:23:27
推
06/04 00:24, , 13F
06/04 00:24, 13F
推
06/04 00:29, , 14F
06/04 00:29, 14F
→
06/04 00:31, , 15F
06/04 00:31, 15F
→
06/04 00:32, , 16F
06/04 00:32, 16F
→
06/04 00:32, , 17F
06/04 00:32, 17F
→
06/04 00:33, , 18F
06/04 00:33, 18F
推
06/04 00:34, , 19F
06/04 00:34, 19F
推
06/04 00:38, , 20F
06/04 00:38, 20F
→
06/04 00:40, , 21F
06/04 00:40, 21F
→
06/04 00:42, , 22F
06/04 00:42, 22F
推
06/04 00:48, , 23F
06/04 00:48, 23F
推
06/04 00:49, , 24F
06/04 00:49, 24F
→
06/04 00:49, , 25F
06/04 00:49, 25F
推
06/04 01:28, , 26F
06/04 01:28, 26F
→
06/04 09:36, , 27F
06/04 09:36, 27F
→
06/04 09:36, , 28F
06/04 09:36, 28F