Re: [問卦] 林奕含事件是不是八卦版史風向最亂的一次消失
八卦板捕風捉影哪時候少過,
不然怎麼叫八卦板?鄉民嘴狗黨嘴人捕風捉影還會少?
阻止別人討論,不知道誰比較像戒嚴,
不過說真的,某些挺林反陳的也要檢討自己,
人家嘴你幾句獵巫和梁女事件,
還不是一堆人不敢正面接,說穿了,還不是真的怕被打臉,
但是我必須要正面的說,她媽到底自己的臉皮有多少價值?
大家都出社會,想講甚麼就大聲講,亂講就自己上法院負責,
就是這樣而已,人家說你不怕梁女事件再現?
鄉民就怕了嗎?是怕三小,
你他媽我挺林我就是獵巫,獵巫又怎樣?
這根本沒甚麼好在意,理由很簡單:
1.如果陳星有幹:皆大歡喜,打到一個真正兇手,避免更多幼苗受害,
陪審團制度就是這樣,看哪邊證據和陳述讓自己信任,
講難聽就是想辦法在法庭上帶風向,看誰說的最終獲得信任,
當然也有陪審團判錯的案例,被打臉就否定全部了嗎?
當然不是。
2.如果陳星沒幹:更皆大歡喜,那代表死者根本沒有遭受不公,
所謂的悲劇根本不存在,沒有甚麼結局比這個更好,
我超希望自己被打臉,大不了被陳星告賠錢坐牢而已。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.34.11.246
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494742651.A.121.html
→
05/14 14:19, , 1F
05/14 14:19, 1F
推
05/14 14:20, , 2F
05/14 14:20, 2F
推
05/14 14:20, , 3F
05/14 14:20, 3F
→
05/14 14:21, , 4F
05/14 14:21, 4F
推
05/14 14:21, , 5F
05/14 14:21, 5F
推
05/14 14:21, , 6F
05/14 14:21, 6F
→
05/14 14:22, , 7F
05/14 14:22, 7F
推
05/14 14:22, , 8F
05/14 14:22, 8F
推
05/14 14:22, , 9F
05/14 14:22, 9F
→
05/14 14:22, , 10F
05/14 14:22, 10F
推
05/14 14:22, , 11F
05/14 14:22, 11F
→
05/14 14:23, , 12F
05/14 14:23, 12F
推
05/14 14:23, , 13F
05/14 14:23, 13F
推
05/14 14:24, , 14F
05/14 14:24, 14F
推
05/14 14:25, , 15F
05/14 14:25, 15F
→
05/14 14:25, , 16F
05/14 14:25, 16F
→
05/14 14:26, , 17F
05/14 14:26, 17F
推
05/14 14:26, , 18F
05/14 14:26, 18F
推
05/14 14:26, , 19F
05/14 14:26, 19F
推
05/14 14:26, , 20F
05/14 14:26, 20F
推
05/14 14:26, , 21F
05/14 14:26, 21F
推
05/14 14:27, , 22F
05/14 14:27, 22F
→
05/14 14:27, , 23F
05/14 14:27, 23F
推
05/14 14:28, , 24F
05/14 14:28, 24F
噓
05/14 14:28, , 25F
05/14 14:28, 25F
→
05/14 14:28, , 26F
05/14 14:28, 26F
→
05/14 14:28, , 27F
05/14 14:28, 27F
→
05/14 14:28, , 28F
05/14 14:28, 28F
推
05/14 14:28, , 29F
05/14 14:28, 29F
→
05/14 14:29, , 30F
05/14 14:29, 30F
推
05/14 14:30, , 31F
05/14 14:30, 31F
推
05/14 14:30, , 32F
05/14 14:30, 32F
→
05/14 14:30, , 33F
05/14 14:30, 33F
推
05/14 14:31, , 34F
05/14 14:31, 34F
→
05/14 14:31, , 35F
05/14 14:31, 35F
→
05/14 14:31, , 36F
05/14 14:31, 36F
→
05/14 14:31, , 37F
05/14 14:31, 37F
推
05/14 14:32, , 38F
05/14 14:32, 38F
→
05/14 14:32, , 39F
05/14 14:32, 39F
還有 54 則推文
→
05/14 15:17, , 94F
05/14 15:17, 94F
→
05/14 15:17, , 95F
05/14 15:17, 95F
推
05/14 15:17, , 96F
05/14 15:17, 96F
→
05/14 15:18, , 97F
05/14 15:18, 97F
推
05/14 15:18, , 98F
05/14 15:18, 98F
→
05/14 15:19, , 99F
05/14 15:19, 99F
噓
05/14 15:19, , 100F
05/14 15:19, 100F
→
05/14 15:20, , 101F
05/14 15:20, 101F
噓
05/14 15:20, , 102F
05/14 15:20, 102F
→
05/14 15:20, , 103F
05/14 15:20, 103F
→
05/14 15:21, , 104F
05/14 15:21, 104F
→
05/14 15:21, , 105F
05/14 15:21, 105F
→
05/14 15:22, , 106F
05/14 15:22, 106F
→
05/14 15:22, , 107F
05/14 15:22, 107F
→
05/14 15:22, , 108F
05/14 15:22, 108F
→
05/14 15:23, , 109F
05/14 15:23, 109F
→
05/14 15:24, , 110F
05/14 15:24, 110F
推
05/14 15:27, , 111F
05/14 15:27, 111F
→
05/14 15:28, , 112F
05/14 15:28, 112F
→
05/14 15:28, , 113F
05/14 15:28, 113F
推
05/14 15:35, , 114F
05/14 15:35, 114F
噓
05/14 15:36, , 115F
05/14 15:36, 115F
噓
05/14 15:38, , 116F
05/14 15:38, 116F
推
05/14 15:47, , 117F
05/14 15:47, 117F
噓
05/14 16:00, , 118F
05/14 16:00, 118F
推
05/14 16:07, , 119F
05/14 16:07, 119F
推
05/14 16:12, , 120F
05/14 16:12, 120F
噓
05/14 16:23, , 121F
05/14 16:23, 121F
→
05/14 16:24, , 122F
05/14 16:24, 122F
→
05/14 16:25, , 123F
05/14 16:25, 123F
噓
05/14 16:35, , 124F
05/14 16:35, 124F
噓
05/14 17:03, , 125F
05/14 17:03, 125F
推
05/14 17:05, , 126F
05/14 17:05, 126F
噓
05/14 17:10, , 127F
05/14 17:10, 127F
噓
05/14 17:20, , 128F
05/14 17:20, 128F
噓
05/14 17:39, , 129F
05/14 17:39, 129F
→
05/14 18:38, , 130F
05/14 18:38, 130F
推
05/14 18:42, , 131F
05/14 18:42, 131F
推
05/14 19:03, , 132F
05/14 19:03, 132F
推
05/14 19:48, , 133F
05/14 19:48, 133F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 67 之 106 篇):