[新聞] 高市規畫第3條捷運 陳菊:不要唱衰高雄消失
高市規畫第3條捷運 陳菊:不要唱衰高雄
前瞻計畫軌道建設高雄需自籌700多億,今天議會總質詢,議員們關切市府財政能否負擔
,副市長許立明強調,配合周邊土地重劃,財政平衡非難事;市長陳菊更指,城市規畫要
有遠見,捷運黃線有助產業提升,盼各界別「唱衰」高雄。
市議員郭建盟提出,台北市財政局長陳志銘日前公開質疑高市爭取前瞻計畫,「債務形同
爆表」,對此他認為,台北得天獨厚,統籌分配款拿走一大塊,還對人指指點點,實在很
不恰當。
「飽漢不知餓漢飢!」副市長許立明說,台北有14條捷運,高雄目前僅2條,建捷運當然
貴,但除了公務預算外,還有捷運建設基金,未來採用公共運輸為導向的TOD模式,土地
增值回歸市庫,財務平衡不困難,不可用簡單加減來粗魯呈現。
國民黨籍市議員周鍾讚則質疑,市府說捷運黃線蓋好之後,每天運量可達67萬人次,究竟
數據怎麼來的應該說清楚,「要前瞻我贊成,但相關數據要客觀一點」。
對此,陳菊表示,捷運一旦形成網狀,加上輕軌加持,相信運量能夠大幅提升,相信每日
67萬人次運量沒有問題;她強調,城市規畫要有前瞻性,像是早在120年前,莫斯科鐵路
地下化已達7成,這就是城市遠見,今日高市規畫第三條捷運,請各界不要「唱衰」,捷
運未來一定能夠爭取產業提升。
(中時)
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170504004449-260407
--
我在零號出口,等你 │https://www.facebook.com/ExitNo0
│https://www.instagram.com/ExitNo0
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.176.43.0
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493901232.A.B0C.html
→
05/04 20:34, , 1F
05/04 20:34, 1F
噓
05/04 20:34, , 2F
05/04 20:34, 2F
噓
05/04 20:34, , 3F
05/04 20:34, 3F
噓
05/04 20:34, , 4F
05/04 20:34, 4F
→
05/04 20:34, , 5F
05/04 20:34, 5F
推
05/04 20:34, , 6F
05/04 20:34, 6F
推
05/04 20:34, , 7F
05/04 20:34, 7F
噓
05/04 20:34, , 8F
05/04 20:34, 8F
推
05/04 20:35, , 9F
05/04 20:35, 9F
噓
05/04 20:35, , 10F
05/04 20:35, 10F
噓
05/04 20:35, , 11F
05/04 20:35, 11F
→
05/04 20:35, , 12F
05/04 20:35, 12F
噓
05/04 20:35, , 13F
05/04 20:35, 13F
→
05/04 20:35, , 14F
05/04 20:35, 14F
→
05/04 20:35, , 15F
05/04 20:35, 15F
推
05/04 20:36, , 16F
05/04 20:36, 16F
噓
05/04 20:36, , 17F
05/04 20:36, 17F
→
05/04 20:36, , 18F
05/04 20:36, 18F
→
05/04 20:36, , 19F
05/04 20:36, 19F
推
05/04 20:36, , 20F
05/04 20:36, 20F
噓
05/04 20:36, , 21F
05/04 20:36, 21F
噓
05/04 20:36, , 22F
05/04 20:36, 22F
→
05/04 20:36, , 23F
05/04 20:36, 23F
噓
05/04 20:37, , 24F
05/04 20:37, 24F
→
05/04 20:37, , 25F
05/04 20:37, 25F
噓
05/04 20:37, , 26F
05/04 20:37, 26F
→
05/04 20:37, , 27F
05/04 20:37, 27F
推
05/04 20:37, , 28F
05/04 20:37, 28F
噓
05/04 20:37, , 29F
05/04 20:37, 29F
噓
05/04 20:37, , 30F
05/04 20:37, 30F
噓
05/04 20:38, , 31F
05/04 20:38, 31F
推
05/04 20:39, , 32F
05/04 20:39, 32F
噓
05/04 20:39, , 33F
05/04 20:39, 33F
推
05/04 20:39, , 34F
05/04 20:39, 34F
噓
05/04 20:41, , 35F
05/04 20:41, 35F
噓
05/04 20:42, , 36F
05/04 20:42, 36F
推
05/04 20:42, , 37F
05/04 20:42, 37F
→
05/04 20:42, , 38F
05/04 20:42, 38F
→
05/04 20:42, , 39F
05/04 20:42, 39F
還有 71 則推文
→
05/04 23:00, , 111F
05/04 23:00, 111F
→
05/04 23:11, , 112F
05/04 23:11, 112F
→
05/04 23:13, , 113F
05/04 23:13, 113F
噓
05/04 23:39, , 114F
05/04 23:39, 114F
→
05/04 23:46, , 115F
05/04 23:46, 115F
噓
05/05 01:08, , 116F
05/05 01:08, 116F
噓
05/05 01:29, , 117F
05/05 01:29, 117F
→
05/05 01:55, , 118F
05/05 01:55, 118F
→
05/05 01:55, , 119F
05/05 01:55, 119F
噓
05/05 07:45, , 120F
05/05 07:45, 120F
噓
05/05 09:28, , 121F
05/05 09:28, 121F
→
05/05 09:54, , 122F
05/05 09:54, 122F
噓
05/05 10:02, , 123F
05/05 10:02, 123F
噓
05/05 10:03, , 124F
05/05 10:03, 124F
推
05/05 10:27, , 125F
05/05 10:27, 125F
推
05/05 10:28, , 126F
05/05 10:28, 126F
噓
05/05 10:32, , 127F
05/05 10:32, 127F
噓
05/05 10:33, , 128F
05/05 10:33, 128F
噓
05/05 10:33, , 129F
05/05 10:33, 129F
噓
05/05 10:36, , 130F
05/05 10:36, 130F
→
05/05 10:38, , 131F
05/05 10:38, 131F
噓
05/05 10:38, , 132F
05/05 10:38, 132F
噓
05/05 10:42, , 133F
05/05 10:42, 133F
噓
05/05 10:42, , 134F
05/05 10:42, 134F
噓
05/05 10:45, , 135F
05/05 10:45, 135F
噓
05/05 10:46, , 136F
05/05 10:46, 136F
→
05/05 10:47, , 137F
05/05 10:47, 137F
噓
05/05 10:53, , 138F
05/05 10:53, 138F
噓
05/05 10:56, , 139F
05/05 10:56, 139F
推
05/05 10:58, , 140F
05/05 10:58, 140F
推
05/05 11:11, , 141F
05/05 11:11, 141F
噓
05/05 12:05, , 142F
05/05 12:05, 142F
噓
05/05 12:24, , 143F
05/05 12:24, 143F
→
05/05 12:43, , 144F
05/05 12:43, 144F
噓
05/05 14:28, , 145F
05/05 14:28, 145F
噓
05/05 21:01, , 146F
05/05 21:01, 146F
噓
05/07 01:36, , 147F
05/07 01:36, 147F
噓
05/07 09:11, , 148F
05/07 09:11, 148F
噓
05/07 13:14, , 149F
05/07 13:14, 149F
噓
05/09 18:51, , 150F
05/09 18:51, 150F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):