[新聞] 服務費立法為工資?商總:定月入十萬好了消失
服務費立法為工資?商總:定月入十萬好了
2017-03-26 中央社 台北26日電
立委擬提案修法,明定服務費、清潔費為工資。服務業居多的商總,理事長賴正鎰今天說
,服務費、小費有其運作生態,立法不要管這種事,不然乾脆規定全國勞工月入十萬好了
。
中國國民黨籍立委陳宜民今天表示,將提案修正勞基法,明定勞工的「工資」應包括服務
費、清潔費,讓服務費、清潔費實質回饋在勞工身上。
中華民國全國商業總會理事長賴正鎰接受訪問表示,目前很多餐飲業若有收取10%的服務
費,大部份業者本來就會在薪資中,以獎勵金方式發給服務做得比較好的員工。
他指出,另外像幫忙停車的服務生之類,顧客會直接給現鈔作為小費,多數運作實況是有
一組人在收,然後發給提供服務的員工。
他強調,服務費、小費這些在實務中,不只台灣,全世界都已經有一套自然生態在運作,
本來就會發給員工,他希望政府或立委不要去管這種事,不然產業生態又會被打亂。
他呼籲,「立法不要管這種事,不然乾脆明定全國勞工都月入新台幣10萬元好了!」
https://udn.com/news/story/7241/2366285?from=udn-ch1_breaknews-1-0-news
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.10.139.101
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1490543428.A.4A2.html
噓
03/26 23:51, , 1F
03/26 23:51, 1F
推
03/26 23:51, , 2F
03/26 23:51, 2F
推
03/26 23:51, , 3F
03/26 23:51, 3F
噓
03/26 23:51, , 4F
03/26 23:51, 4F
噓
03/26 23:51, , 5F
03/26 23:51, 5F
推
03/26 23:51, , 6F
03/26 23:51, 6F
推
03/26 23:51, , 7F
03/26 23:51, 7F
噓
03/26 23:52, , 8F
03/26 23:52, 8F
推
03/26 23:52, , 9F
03/26 23:52, 9F
→
03/26 23:52, , 10F
03/26 23:52, 10F
噓
03/26 23:53, , 11F
03/26 23:53, 11F
推
03/26 23:53, , 12F
03/26 23:53, 12F
→
03/26 23:53, , 13F
03/26 23:53, 13F
→
03/26 23:53, , 14F
03/26 23:53, 14F
推
03/26 23:53, , 15F
03/26 23:53, 15F
→
03/26 23:53, , 16F
03/26 23:53, 16F
推
03/26 23:53, , 17F
03/26 23:53, 17F
噓
03/26 23:54, , 18F
03/26 23:54, 18F
→
03/26 23:54, , 19F
03/26 23:54, 19F
噓
03/26 23:54, , 20F
03/26 23:54, 20F
→
03/26 23:54, , 21F
03/26 23:54, 21F
噓
03/26 23:54, , 22F
03/26 23:54, 22F
推
03/26 23:55, , 23F
03/26 23:55, 23F
推
03/26 23:55, , 24F
03/26 23:55, 24F
→
03/26 23:55, , 25F
03/26 23:55, 25F
→
03/26 23:56, , 26F
03/26 23:56, 26F
噓
03/26 23:56, , 27F
03/26 23:56, 27F
噓
03/26 23:57, , 28F
03/26 23:57, 28F
推
03/26 23:57, , 29F
03/26 23:57, 29F
噓
03/26 23:58, , 30F
03/26 23:58, 30F
噓
03/26 23:58, , 31F
03/26 23:58, 31F
推
03/26 23:59, , 32F
03/26 23:59, 32F
噓
03/26 23:59, , 33F
03/26 23:59, 33F
→
03/26 23:59, , 34F
03/26 23:59, 34F
推
03/27 00:00, , 35F
03/27 00:00, 35F
推
03/27 00:03, , 36F
03/27 00:03, 36F
噓
03/27 00:04, , 37F
03/27 00:04, 37F
噓
03/27 00:05, , 38F
03/27 00:05, 38F
噓
03/27 00:06, , 39F
03/27 00:06, 39F
→
03/27 00:09, , 40F
03/27 00:09, 40F
噓
03/27 00:10, , 41F
03/27 00:10, 41F
噓
03/27 00:12, , 42F
03/27 00:12, 42F
推
03/27 00:18, , 43F
03/27 00:18, 43F
噓
03/27 00:18, , 44F
03/27 00:18, 44F
噓
03/27 00:20, , 45F
03/27 00:20, 45F
推
03/27 00:55, , 46F
03/27 00:55, 46F
噓
03/27 01:27, , 47F
03/27 01:27, 47F
噓
03/27 01:39, , 48F
03/27 01:39, 48F
噓
03/27 01:49, , 49F
03/27 01:49, 49F
噓
03/27 02:29, , 50F
03/27 02:29, 50F
→
03/27 04:43, , 51F
03/27 04:43, 51F
→
03/27 07:03, , 52F
03/27 07:03, 52F
噓
03/27 15:10, , 53F
03/27 15:10, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):