[問卦] 為什麼老闆要多花30%的錢請男員工?消失
剛看到一個影片
https://goo.gl/ElJQ0u
大家不點進去看也沒關係 影片內容就是一男一女在路邊擺擦鞋的攤位
男的擦鞋要1美元 女的只要0.77美元 不停強調兩位提供的服務完全一樣
大家來擦鞋的時候 就跟客人說:你知道選擇0.77元 意味著搶劫嗎
然後打出字幕:"全球女性薪資平均只有男性的77%"
你若選擇0.77美元的擦鞋服務 意味著搶劫女性... bla bla bla
我看完覺得很奇怪
如果女性真的可以用男性77%的成本提供同樣的生產力 也就是說男員工比女貴30%
那老闆幹嘛多花30%的錢請男員工?(77x130%約=100)
難道老闆跟自己口袋過不去? 男員工應該要全失業吧
台積電怎麼那麼笨,多付30%的錢請男工程師,不會請女工程師省錢嗎?
有沒有老闆很笨的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.62.93.176
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1490352199.A.11F.html
→
03/24 18:43, , 1F
03/24 18:43, 1F
推
03/24 18:44, , 2F
03/24 18:44, 2F
能花77%請一個一樣能力的員工 老闆最好是會笨到多花錢請貴的
→
03/24 18:44, , 3F
03/24 18:44, 3F
推
03/24 18:44, , 4F
03/24 18:44, 4F
噓
03/24 18:44, , 5F
03/24 18:44, 5F
→
03/24 18:44, , 6F
03/24 18:44, 6F
→
03/24 18:44, , 7F
03/24 18:44, 7F
推
03/24 18:44, , 8F
03/24 18:44, 8F
推
03/24 18:44, , 9F
03/24 18:44, 9F
噓
03/24 18:45, , 10F
03/24 18:45, 10F
→
03/24 18:45, , 11F
03/24 18:45, 11F
叫老公出保母的錢呀
→
03/24 18:45, , 12F
03/24 18:45, 12F
推
03/24 18:45, , 13F
03/24 18:45, 13F
→
03/24 18:45, , 14F
03/24 18:45, 14F
推
03/24 18:46, , 15F
03/24 18:46, 15F
→
03/24 18:46, , 16F
03/24 18:46, 16F
痾...那女方不也出不起...
推
03/24 18:47, , 17F
03/24 18:47, 17F
推
03/24 18:47, , 18F
03/24 18:47, 18F
推
03/24 18:48, , 19F
03/24 18:48, 19F
→
03/24 18:48, , 20F
03/24 18:48, 20F
你在講什麼 薪水在聘請的時候就講好了
推
03/24 18:48, , 21F
03/24 18:48, 21F
噓
03/24 18:50, , 22F
03/24 18:50, 22F
→
03/24 18:50, , 23F
03/24 18:50, 23F
這兩個能力有一樣嗎?一樣的話我當然請35K的 誰要多花一萬五 又不是潘仔
推
03/24 18:50, , 24F
03/24 18:50, 24F
不是被操作過
這個數據沒有控制任何變因
是直接把所有全職男性跟所有全職女性的薪水平均來比較
先觀察一下男女從事的行業跟就讀的科系比例
你就知道這個77%的數據有多智障了
推
03/24 18:51, , 25F
03/24 18:51, 25F
→
03/24 18:51, , 26F
03/24 18:51, 26F
※ 編輯: PTTLawyer (61.62.93.176), 03/24/2017 18:53:17
推
03/24 18:59, , 27F
03/24 18:59, 27F
→
03/24 18:59, , 28F
03/24 18:59, 28F
推
03/24 19:03, , 29F
03/24 19:03, 29F
→
03/24 19:04, , 30F
03/24 19:04, 30F
推
03/24 19:07, , 31F
03/24 19:07, 31F
→
03/24 19:07, , 32F
03/24 19:07, 32F
→
03/24 19:07, , 33F
03/24 19:07, 33F
推
03/24 19:09, , 34F
03/24 19:09, 34F
推
03/24 19:10, , 35F
03/24 19:10, 35F
推
03/24 19:11, , 36F
03/24 19:11, 36F
推
03/24 19:11, , 37F
03/24 19:11, 37F
噓
03/24 19:12, , 38F
03/24 19:12, 38F
→
03/24 19:12, , 39F
03/24 19:12, 39F
→
03/24 19:26, , 40F
03/24 19:26, 40F
推
03/24 19:30, , 41F
03/24 19:30, 41F
推
03/24 19:41, , 42F
03/24 19:41, 42F
推
03/24 19:44, , 43F
03/24 19:44, 43F
→
03/24 19:45, , 44F
03/24 19:45, 44F
推
03/24 19:53, , 45F
03/24 19:53, 45F
推
03/24 22:11, , 46F
03/24 22:11, 46F
推
03/25 00:06, , 47F
03/25 00:06, 47F
推
03/25 00:06, , 48F
03/25 00:06, 48F
推
03/25 00:06, , 49F
03/25 00:06, 49F
噓
03/25 04:45, , 50F
03/25 04:45, 50F
噓
03/25 04:49, , 51F
03/25 04:49, 51F
推
03/25 10:18, , 52F
03/25 10:18, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):