[新聞] 擬拒實施一例一休 南投縣長:被糾舉沒差消失
http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=233170
擬拒實施一例一休 南投縣長:被糾舉沒差,不被抓去關就好
一例一休上路後爭議不斷,有些餐飲業者以人力成本增加為由漲價,有些企業則乾脆不讓
員工加班,以減少人事費支出。對此,南投縣長林明溱昨(13)日開全台第一槍,要求法
務人員找出相關法令,讓南投不用施行一例一休;林還強調「被糾舉、記過都沒關係,只
要不被抓去關就好!」
根據《聯合報》報導,林明溱昨天在縣務會議上提到,觀光是南投的命脈,各遊樂區過去
都給員工彈性休假,每年5、6月和11月淡季員工都在放假,只有周休日上班;寒暑假旺季
,則是全員上班,勞資雙方早就有一定的默契。
針對一例一休的規定,林明溱昨要求法務人員找出相關法令,讓南投不用施行一例一休,
他強調「被糾舉、記過都沒關係,只要不被抓去關就好!」林明溱還說「縣內的觀光業都
快被一例一休給掐死了,我能不跳出來嗎?」
對於南投縣大動作表態反一例一休,勞動部次長廖蕙芳昨天則回應,「一例一休與勞基法
的法律效力適用於全國,各縣市都必須遵守。」
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
慣老闆:沒給加班費沒差,不被抓去關就好
政客:被糾舉沒差,不被抓去關就好
--
吾開天眼覷紅塵,可憐身是眼中人 http://tinyurl.com/nqprycc
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.224.96.119
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489461120.A.F9D.html
推
03/14 11:12, , 1F
03/14 11:12, 1F
噓
03/14 11:12, , 2F
03/14 11:12, 2F
→
03/14 11:13, , 3F
03/14 11:13, 3F
噓
03/14 11:13, , 4F
03/14 11:13, 4F
推
03/14 11:14, , 5F
03/14 11:14, 5F
噓
03/14 11:14, , 6F
03/14 11:14, 6F
→
03/14 11:14, , 7F
03/14 11:14, 7F
推
03/14 11:15, , 8F
03/14 11:15, 8F
推
03/14 11:15, , 9F
03/14 11:15, 9F
推
03/14 11:15, , 10F
03/14 11:15, 10F
→
03/14 11:15, , 11F
03/14 11:15, 11F
→
03/14 11:16, , 12F
03/14 11:16, 12F
→
03/14 11:16, , 13F
03/14 11:16, 13F
→
03/14 11:16, , 14F
03/14 11:16, 14F
推
03/14 11:16, , 15F
03/14 11:16, 15F
推
03/14 11:17, , 16F
03/14 11:17, 16F
噓
03/14 11:17, , 17F
03/14 11:17, 17F
推
03/14 11:19, , 18F
03/14 11:19, 18F
推
03/14 11:20, , 19F
03/14 11:20, 19F
→
03/14 11:21, , 20F
03/14 11:21, 20F
→
03/14 11:22, , 21F
03/14 11:22, 21F
→
03/14 11:23, , 22F
03/14 11:23, 22F
推
03/14 11:24, , 23F
03/14 11:24, 23F
噓
03/14 11:24, , 24F
03/14 11:24, 24F
→
03/14 11:25, , 25F
03/14 11:25, 25F
推
03/14 11:31, , 26F
03/14 11:31, 26F
噓
03/14 11:31, , 27F
03/14 11:31, 27F
推
03/14 11:33, , 28F
03/14 11:33, 28F
噓
03/14 11:37, , 29F
03/14 11:37, 29F
→
03/14 11:37, , 30F
03/14 11:37, 30F
→
03/14 11:38, , 31F
03/14 11:38, 31F
噓
03/14 11:38, , 32F
03/14 11:38, 32F
推
03/14 11:40, , 33F
03/14 11:40, 33F
推
03/14 11:48, , 34F
03/14 11:48, 34F
推
03/14 11:55, , 35F
03/14 11:55, 35F
→
03/14 11:55, , 36F
03/14 11:55, 36F
→
03/14 11:55, , 37F
03/14 11:55, 37F
噓
03/14 11:57, , 38F
03/14 11:57, 38F
→
03/14 11:59, , 39F
03/14 11:59, 39F
→
03/14 12:00, , 40F
03/14 12:00, 40F
→
03/14 12:00, , 41F
03/14 12:00, 41F
→
03/14 12:05, , 42F
03/14 12:05, 42F
→
03/14 12:05, , 43F
03/14 12:05, 43F
→
03/14 12:05, , 44F
03/14 12:05, 44F
→
03/14 12:05, , 45F
03/14 12:05, 45F
推
03/14 12:17, , 46F
03/14 12:17, 46F
噓
03/14 12:26, , 47F
03/14 12:26, 47F
→
03/14 12:31, , 48F
03/14 12:31, 48F
→
03/14 12:31, , 49F
03/14 12:31, 49F
→
03/14 12:37, , 50F
03/14 12:37, 50F
噓
03/14 12:38, , 51F
03/14 12:38, 51F
→
03/14 12:39, , 52F
03/14 12:39, 52F
→
03/14 12:39, , 53F
03/14 12:39, 53F
→
03/14 12:40, , 54F
03/14 12:40, 54F
→
03/14 12:40, , 55F
03/14 12:40, 55F
→
03/14 13:18, , 56F
03/14 13:18, 56F
→
03/14 13:19, , 57F
03/14 13:19, 57F
→
03/14 13:19, , 58F
03/14 13:19, 58F
噓
03/14 13:40, , 59F
03/14 13:40, 59F
噓
03/14 13:41, , 60F
03/14 13:41, 60F
噓
03/14 13:41, , 61F
03/14 13:41, 61F
噓
03/14 13:45, , 62F
03/14 13:45, 62F
推
03/14 13:47, , 63F
03/14 13:47, 63F
→
03/14 16:24, , 64F
03/14 16:24, 64F
噓
03/14 18:13, , 65F
03/14 18:13, 65F
噓
03/14 18:13, , 66F
03/14 18:13, 66F
→
03/14 18:38, , 67F
03/14 18:38, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):