[新聞] 退役中將羅吉源:薩德不可能擺在台灣消失
1.媒體來源:
中時
2.完整新聞標題:
退役中將羅吉源:薩德不可能擺在台灣
3.完整新聞內文:
美國在韓國部署薩德系統,引發中韓緊張形勢;外界關注,台灣是否也會引進薩德。退役
陸軍中將羅吉源表示,台灣若部署薩德,擺明是對著中國大陸,自然會挑起台海危機,激
怒中國大陸,台灣不能犯了戰術與戰略的錯誤。
羅吉源接受港媒中評社訪問表示,韓國部署薩德系統(Terminal High Altitude Area
Defense,THAAD)目的是防禦北韓,但薩德監視能力,可能會提供一些追蹤數據給美國
,削弱中國對美的作戰能力,因此中國不能忍受。
而台灣若引進薩德,就擺明是對準中國,自然會激怒中國大陸,挑起台海危機,台灣不能
犯了戰術與戰略的錯誤。
羅吉源認為,處理台海問題,先決條件還是政治層面,最好方法是蔡政府宣布九二共識,
可以避免不必要的軍事衝突。事實上,美方最終還是會承認一中,中方對美貿易也退讓一
步,中美關係若是彼此非常尊重,「蔡英文沒有戲好唱」。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170311001110-260417
5.備註:
有這種退將,還需要敵人嗎?
老共一千多枚飛彈瞄準台灣,你怎麼不說,
添購薩德系統也是剛好而已!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.181.157.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489204023.A.9F7.html
→
03/11 11:47, , 1F
03/11 11:47, 1F
推
03/11 11:47, , 2F
03/11 11:47, 2F
推
03/11 11:48, , 3F
03/11 11:48, 3F
→
03/11 11:48, , 4F
03/11 11:48, 4F
推
03/11 11:48, , 5F
03/11 11:48, 5F
推
03/11 11:49, , 6F
03/11 11:49, 6F
推
03/11 11:49, , 7F
03/11 11:49, 7F
推
03/11 11:49, , 8F
03/11 11:49, 8F
噓
03/11 11:49, , 9F
03/11 11:49, 9F
→
03/11 11:50, , 10F
03/11 11:50, 10F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 11F
03/11 11:50, 11F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 12F
03/11 11:50, 12F
推
03/11 11:50, , 13F
03/11 11:50, 13F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 14F
03/11 11:50, 14F
→
03/11 11:50, , 15F
03/11 11:50, 15F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 16F
03/11 11:50, 16F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 17F
03/11 11:50, 17F
噓
03/11 11:50, , 18F
03/11 11:50, 18F
→
03/11 11:51, , 19F
03/11 11:51, 19F
推
03/11 11:51, , 20F
03/11 11:51, 20F
推
03/11 11:51, , 21F
03/11 11:51, 21F
噓
03/11 11:52, , 22F
03/11 11:52, 22F
噓
03/11 11:52, , 23F
03/11 11:52, 23F
噓
03/11 11:53, , 24F
03/11 11:53, 24F
噓
03/11 11:53, , 25F
03/11 11:53, 25F
推
03/11 11:54, , 26F
03/11 11:54, 26F
噓
03/11 11:55, , 27F
03/11 11:55, 27F
→
03/11 11:55, , 28F
03/11 11:55, 28F
→
03/11 11:56, , 29F
03/11 11:56, 29F
→
03/11 11:57, , 30F
03/11 11:57, 30F
→
03/11 11:58, , 31F
03/11 11:58, 31F
噓
03/11 11:58, , 32F
03/11 11:58, 32F
噓
03/11 11:59, , 33F
03/11 11:59, 33F
推
03/11 11:59, , 34F
03/11 11:59, 34F
→
03/11 11:59, , 35F
03/11 11:59, 35F
→
03/11 11:59, , 36F
03/11 11:59, 36F
→
03/11 12:01, , 37F
03/11 12:01, 37F
噓
03/11 12:01, , 38F
03/11 12:01, 38F
→
03/11 12:01, , 39F
03/11 12:01, 39F
噓
03/11 12:01, , 40F
03/11 12:01, 40F
噓
03/11 12:02, , 41F
03/11 12:02, 41F
推
03/11 12:03, , 42F
03/11 12:03, 42F
噓
03/11 12:03, , 43F
03/11 12:03, 43F
→
03/11 12:07, , 44F
03/11 12:07, 44F
推
03/11 12:07, , 45F
03/11 12:07, 45F
推
03/11 12:08, , 46F
03/11 12:08, 46F
推
03/11 12:10, , 47F
03/11 12:10, 47F
噓
03/11 12:11, , 48F
03/11 12:11, 48F
推
03/11 12:15, , 49F
03/11 12:15, 49F
噓
03/11 12:15, , 50F
03/11 12:15, 50F
推
03/11 12:17, , 51F
03/11 12:17, 51F
噓
03/11 12:18, , 52F
03/11 12:18, 52F
噓
03/11 12:18, , 53F
03/11 12:18, 53F
噓
03/11 12:22, , 54F
03/11 12:22, 54F
推
03/11 12:24, , 55F
03/11 12:24, 55F
噓
03/11 12:25, , 56F
03/11 12:25, 56F
噓
03/11 12:25, , 57F
03/11 12:25, 57F
噓
03/11 12:26, , 58F
03/11 12:26, 58F
→
03/11 12:27, , 59F
03/11 12:27, 59F
噓
03/11 12:27, , 60F
03/11 12:27, 60F
噓
03/11 12:27, , 61F
03/11 12:27, 61F
噓
03/11 12:33, , 62F
03/11 12:33, 62F
噓
03/11 12:34, , 63F
03/11 12:34, 63F
推
03/11 12:40, , 64F
03/11 12:40, 64F
噓
03/11 12:44, , 65F
03/11 12:44, 65F
→
03/11 12:44, , 66F
03/11 12:44, 66F
噓
03/11 12:44, , 67F
03/11 12:44, 67F
噓
03/11 12:51, , 68F
03/11 12:51, 68F
→
03/11 12:54, , 69F
03/11 12:54, 69F
噓
03/11 13:01, , 70F
03/11 13:01, 70F
→
03/11 13:02, , 71F
03/11 13:02, 71F
→
03/11 13:02, , 72F
03/11 13:02, 72F
噓
03/11 13:07, , 73F
03/11 13:07, 73F
推
03/11 13:17, , 74F
03/11 13:17, 74F
噓
03/11 13:32, , 75F
03/11 13:32, 75F
噓
03/11 13:37, , 76F
03/11 13:37, 76F
噓
03/11 13:43, , 77F
03/11 13:43, 77F
→
03/11 13:52, , 78F
03/11 13:52, 78F
噓
03/11 15:27, , 79F
03/11 15:27, 79F
→
03/11 15:29, , 80F
03/11 15:29, 80F
噓
03/11 16:47, , 81F
03/11 16:47, 81F
推
03/11 23:45, , 82F
03/11 23:45, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):