[新聞] 孫文學校:蔣經國最大的錯誤就是用李登輝消失
1.媒體來源:
中時
2.完整新聞標題:
孫文學校:蔣經國最大的錯誤就是用李登輝
3.完整新聞內文:
孫文學校昨天(9日)舉辦論壇,主題是「國民黨領導人歷史評價-蔣經國」,由文化大
學國發與陸研所教授教授龐建國擔任主講。他表示,已故總統蔣經國對台灣的貢獻有目共
睹,若要說他做錯什麼?一件事,就是提拔了李登輝。
據港媒中評社訊,孫文學校本月舉辦「國民黨領導人歷史評價系列講座」,3月2日的主題
是蔣中正、3月16日的主題是李登輝,而9日談的就是以上兩任之間的蔣經國。
主講人龐建國說:「回顧蔣經國的一生,1950-1960年代襄助蔣中正穩住局勢;1970-1980
年代執政時期大刀闊斧,開啟十大建設,提高了台灣的經濟水平;晚年解嚴與開放大陸探
親,開展了兩岸交流。但他做錯過一件事,那就是用了李登輝!」
龐建國解釋:「雖然蔣經國錯用李登輝,但在當時不失為合理之考量。其一,李登輝之子
早逝,不會有家族傳位的可能;其二,李登輝有海外求學的留美背景;其三,李登輝忍耐
的精神恰如幕府大將軍德川家康。」
龐建國最後提了蔣經國生前的自我評價作結:「我知道我是專制者,但我會是最後一位」
、「今後只有國家、民族和三民主義的萬歲,沒有個人的萬歲」、「政府在哪裡,法統就
在哪裡」、「沒有永遠的執政黨」。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170310001872-260407
5.備註:
蔣經國都已去世很久了,還拿來消費。
而且蔣經國真是那樣想的嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.181.157.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489157468.A.809.html
→
03/10 22:52, , 1F
03/10 22:52, 1F
推
03/10 22:52, , 2F
03/10 22:52, 2F
→
03/10 22:52, , 3F
03/10 22:52, 3F
噓
03/10 22:52, , 4F
03/10 22:52, 4F
推
03/10 22:52, , 5F
03/10 22:52, 5F
→
03/10 22:52, , 6F
03/10 22:52, 6F
推
03/10 22:52, , 7F
03/10 22:52, 7F
→
03/10 22:53, , 8F
03/10 22:53, 8F
推
03/10 22:53, , 9F
03/10 22:53, 9F
推
03/10 22:53, , 10F
03/10 22:53, 10F
→
03/10 22:53, , 11F
03/10 22:53, 11F
→
03/10 22:53, , 12F
03/10 22:53, 12F
→
03/10 22:53, , 13F
03/10 22:53, 13F
→
03/10 22:53, , 14F
03/10 22:53, 14F
→
03/10 22:53, , 15F
03/10 22:53, 15F
推
03/10 22:54, , 16F
03/10 22:54, 16F
→
03/10 22:54, , 17F
03/10 22:54, 17F
推
03/10 22:54, , 18F
03/10 22:54, 18F
→
03/10 22:54, , 19F
03/10 22:54, 19F
→
03/10 22:55, , 20F
03/10 22:55, 20F
→
03/10 22:55, , 21F
03/10 22:55, 21F
→
03/10 22:56, , 22F
03/10 22:56, 22F
推
03/10 22:56, , 23F
03/10 22:56, 23F
推
03/10 22:57, , 24F
03/10 22:57, 24F
→
03/10 22:57, , 25F
03/10 22:57, 25F
→
03/10 22:57, , 26F
03/10 22:57, 26F
→
03/10 22:57, , 27F
03/10 22:57, 27F
噓
03/10 22:58, , 28F
03/10 22:58, 28F
→
03/10 22:58, , 29F
03/10 22:58, 29F
推
03/10 22:58, , 30F
03/10 22:58, 30F
推
03/10 22:58, , 31F
03/10 22:58, 31F
→
03/10 22:58, , 32F
03/10 22:58, 32F
→
03/10 22:59, , 33F
03/10 22:59, 33F
→
03/10 22:59, , 34F
03/10 22:59, 34F
推
03/10 22:59, , 35F
03/10 22:59, 35F
推
03/10 22:59, , 36F
03/10 22:59, 36F
推
03/10 22:59, , 37F
03/10 22:59, 37F
推
03/10 22:59, , 38F
03/10 22:59, 38F
→
03/10 23:00, , 39F
03/10 23:00, 39F
還有 26 則推文
噓
03/10 23:37, , 66F
03/10 23:37, 66F
噓
03/10 23:41, , 67F
03/10 23:41, 67F
推
03/10 23:45, , 68F
03/10 23:45, 68F
→
03/10 23:49, , 69F
03/10 23:49, 69F
噓
03/10 23:50, , 70F
03/10 23:50, 70F
→
03/10 23:50, , 71F
03/10 23:50, 71F
→
03/10 23:51, , 72F
03/10 23:51, 72F
噓
03/10 23:54, , 73F
03/10 23:54, 73F
噓
03/10 23:58, , 74F
03/10 23:58, 74F
推
03/11 00:01, , 75F
03/11 00:01, 75F
噓
03/11 00:10, , 76F
03/11 00:10, 76F
噓
03/11 00:11, , 77F
03/11 00:11, 77F
→
03/11 00:12, , 78F
03/11 00:12, 78F
→
03/11 00:13, , 79F
03/11 00:13, 79F
噓
03/11 00:28, , 80F
03/11 00:28, 80F
噓
03/11 00:32, , 81F
03/11 00:32, 81F
→
03/11 00:44, , 82F
03/11 00:44, 82F
噓
03/11 00:46, , 83F
03/11 00:46, 83F
→
03/11 00:49, , 84F
03/11 00:49, 84F
噓
03/11 00:50, , 85F
03/11 00:50, 85F
噓
03/11 00:51, , 86F
03/11 00:51, 86F
→
03/11 00:51, , 87F
03/11 00:51, 87F
推
03/11 00:57, , 88F
03/11 00:57, 88F
推
03/11 01:07, , 89F
03/11 01:07, 89F
→
03/11 01:12, , 90F
03/11 01:12, 90F
→
03/11 01:15, , 91F
03/11 01:15, 91F
噓
03/11 01:36, , 92F
03/11 01:36, 92F
→
03/11 01:40, , 93F
03/11 01:40, 93F
噓
03/11 02:27, , 94F
03/11 02:27, 94F
噓
03/11 03:22, , 95F
03/11 03:22, 95F
噓
03/11 03:24, , 96F
03/11 03:24, 96F
→
03/11 03:26, , 97F
03/11 03:26, 97F
→
03/11 03:27, , 98F
03/11 03:27, 98F
噓
03/11 06:10, , 99F
03/11 06:10, 99F
→
03/11 06:10, , 100F
03/11 06:10, 100F
→
03/11 07:19, , 101F
03/11 07:19, 101F
推
03/11 08:55, , 102F
03/11 08:55, 102F
噓
04/07 21:15, , 103F
04/07 21:15, 103F
推
04/07 21:16, , 104F
04/07 21:16, 104F
推
04/07 21:17, , 105F
04/07 21:17, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):