[新聞] 繳稅讓他們爽的?「美寶」探親申請補助消失
繳稅讓他們爽的?「美寶」探親申請補助
http://m.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20170216/1057206/
這對居住在美國的夫妻、在美產子,在去年底攜子返台探親,事後,這對夫妻與網友分享
「探親時在台灣申請到的補助」,令其他網友不滿「我繳的稅是讓你們爽的???」
這對夫妻在PTT的媽寶版分享經驗,他們返台後帶著孩子至移民署辦理定居證,接著在戶
政市務所辦理入籍等,接著申請(1)新北市生育津貼2萬元,(2)父母未就業津貼補助,以
及至(3)勞保局國民年金申請生育奬勵金36564元。由於這對夫妻明明就在美國居住,一返
台就申請補助,引起其他網友質疑,(1)生育津貼,依法是新生兒之母或父其中一方,設
籍並實際居住10個月以上,夫妻都在美國,怎麼可以申請?(2)父母未就業津貼補助,「
這還不扯嗎?還敢申請這種津貼」;(3)勞保局申請生育奬勵金,關於這點,網友認為,
因為有付國民年金才符合資格,申請這個應沒太大問題。
由於這對夫妻的分享文引起媽寶版極大反彈,不久後即刪文,但還是被備份甚至轉PO八卦
版,其他網友也感到不平,「這對夫妻憑什麼?」、「吃人夠夠」、「我的稅金不想給他
們用」、「其實是公所人員的問題 ,審核文件不確實,有問題還發錢」、「會不會是爸
爸在台工作?」、「據PTT的歷史發文,他們是夫妻都在美國喔」(即時新聞中心/綜合
報導)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.71.8.151
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487216837.A.DBC.html
推
02/16 11:47, , 1F
02/16 11:47, 1F
→
02/16 11:47, , 2F
02/16 11:47, 2F
推
02/16 11:48, , 3F
02/16 11:48, 3F
推
02/16 11:48, , 4F
02/16 11:48, 4F
推
02/16 11:48, , 5F
02/16 11:48, 5F
推
02/16 11:48, , 6F
02/16 11:48, 6F
→
02/16 11:48, , 7F
02/16 11:48, 7F
→
02/16 11:49, , 8F
02/16 11:49, 8F
→
02/16 11:49, , 9F
02/16 11:49, 9F
推
02/16 11:49, , 10F
02/16 11:49, 10F
→
02/16 11:49, , 11F
02/16 11:49, 11F
→
02/16 11:49, , 12F
02/16 11:49, 12F
→
02/16 11:50, , 13F
02/16 11:50, 13F
推
02/16 11:51, , 14F
02/16 11:51, 14F
推
02/16 11:51, , 15F
02/16 11:51, 15F
推
02/16 11:52, , 16F
02/16 11:52, 16F
噓
02/16 11:52, , 17F
02/16 11:52, 17F
推
02/16 11:53, , 18F
02/16 11:53, 18F
噓
02/16 11:53, , 19F
02/16 11:53, 19F
推
02/16 11:53, , 20F
02/16 11:53, 20F
推
02/16 11:54, , 21F
02/16 11:54, 21F
噓
02/16 11:54, , 22F
02/16 11:54, 22F
推
02/16 11:56, , 23F
02/16 11:56, 23F
推
02/16 11:56, , 24F
02/16 11:56, 24F
→
02/16 11:57, , 25F
02/16 11:57, 25F
推
02/16 11:59, , 26F
02/16 11:59, 26F
噓
02/16 12:00, , 27F
02/16 12:00, 27F
→
02/16 12:00, , 28F
02/16 12:00, 28F
噓
02/16 12:02, , 29F
02/16 12:02, 29F
→
02/16 12:03, , 30F
02/16 12:03, 30F
推
02/16 12:03, , 31F
02/16 12:03, 31F
推
02/16 12:05, , 32F
02/16 12:05, 32F
推
02/16 12:06, , 33F
02/16 12:06, 33F
→
02/16 12:07, , 34F
02/16 12:07, 34F
推
02/16 12:07, , 35F
02/16 12:07, 35F
→
02/16 12:09, , 36F
02/16 12:09, 36F
推
02/16 12:10, , 37F
02/16 12:10, 37F
→
02/16 12:10, , 38F
02/16 12:10, 38F
推
02/16 12:11, , 39F
02/16 12:11, 39F
還有 61 則推文
推
02/16 15:54, , 101F
02/16 15:54, 101F
推
02/16 16:04, , 102F
02/16 16:04, 102F
噓
02/16 16:08, , 103F
02/16 16:08, 103F
推
02/16 16:08, , 104F
02/16 16:08, 104F
推
02/16 16:20, , 105F
02/16 16:20, 105F
推
02/16 16:35, , 106F
02/16 16:35, 106F
推
02/16 16:36, , 107F
02/16 16:36, 107F
推
02/16 17:00, , 108F
02/16 17:00, 108F
推
02/16 17:22, , 109F
02/16 17:22, 109F
推
02/16 17:23, , 110F
02/16 17:23, 110F
推
02/16 17:48, , 111F
02/16 17:48, 111F
推
02/16 17:50, , 112F
02/16 17:50, 112F
噓
02/16 17:52, , 113F
02/16 17:52, 113F
推
02/16 18:54, , 114F
02/16 18:54, 114F
推
02/16 18:56, , 115F
02/16 18:56, 115F
推
02/16 19:04, , 116F
02/16 19:04, 116F
推
02/16 19:12, , 117F
02/16 19:12, 117F
推
02/16 20:19, , 118F
02/16 20:19, 118F
推
02/16 20:39, , 119F
02/16 20:39, 119F
推
02/16 21:25, , 120F
02/16 21:25, 120F
推
02/16 22:25, , 121F
02/16 22:25, 121F
推
02/16 22:49, , 122F
02/16 22:49, 122F
推
02/16 23:29, , 123F
02/16 23:29, 123F
噓
02/16 23:35, , 124F
02/16 23:35, 124F
推
02/17 00:03, , 125F
02/17 00:03, 125F
推
02/17 01:11, , 126F
02/17 01:11, 126F
噓
02/17 01:50, , 127F
02/17 01:50, 127F
推
02/17 02:19, , 128F
02/17 02:19, 128F
→
02/17 02:19, , 129F
02/17 02:19, 129F
→
02/17 02:20, , 130F
02/17 02:20, 130F
推
02/17 02:20, , 131F
02/17 02:20, 131F
推
02/17 02:22, , 132F
02/17 02:22, 132F
→
02/17 02:23, , 133F
02/17 02:23, 133F
噓
02/17 07:00, , 134F
02/17 07:00, 134F
推
02/17 08:00, , 135F
02/17 08:00, 135F
推
02/17 08:59, , 136F
02/17 08:59, 136F
推
02/17 17:52, , 137F
02/17 17:52, 137F
推
02/17 17:53, , 138F
02/17 17:53, 138F
推
02/17 17:53, , 139F
02/17 17:53, 139F
推
02/17 20:58, , 140F
02/17 20:58, 140F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):