[新聞] 民眾:小病變大病 誰負責?消失
民眾:小病變大病 誰負責?
中時電子報 廖珮妤/台北報導
衛福部研擬限制醫學中心、區域醫院的輕症門診量,不僅醫院不滿,民眾也憂心日
後到大醫院看病會被拒於門外,病情惡化誰負責?民間團體則認為,若未搭配其他
支付調整、轉診誘因,一切只是空談,甚至是變相鼓勵醫院收自費病患。
有糖尿病史的沈先生固定到北部醫學中心看病,他說,糖尿病可能出現不少併發症
,以他為例,若出現視力模糊的問題,可能是前晚睡不好,也可能是糖尿病引起的
眼病變,他要怎麼判斷自己是輕症還是重症,如果就醫被拒絕,疾病惡化誰該負責
?
沈先生進一步說,他信任、也一直在醫學中心固定看病,即便多花點錢也沒關係,
他每個月都繳健保費,為什麼不能自己選擇到哪邊看病?
醫改會副執行長朱顯光則說,像是青春痘、小感冒、穩定的高血壓,確實不應該到
大醫院就醫,不過用拒絕給付的方式,來限制醫學中心收治輕症患者只是做半套,
實際能減少到什麼程度,令人存疑。
要徹底解決小病到大醫院,除需教育民眾,朱顯光也說,要從根本改變制度,急診
部分不符合資格者,病人就須自費,否則依檢傷分類增加個100元, 大家根本搞不
懂,夜間不漲價的作法,甚至可能讓民眾以拖待變。
他建議,門診部分應放寬基層診所給付藥物及大小醫院給付同病同酬,如果民眾在
診所和台大看感冒都拿一樣的藥,獲得一樣的處置,自然會減少小病上大醫院。
督保盟發言人滕西華說,降低大醫院輕症門診量, 是9月健保會付費者代表提出的
方案,當時認為一年降低10%對醫院來說較合理,同時提高重症支付標準,不知衛
福部為何突然拋出降20%的規畫,且無任何配套,到時一定怨聲載道。
滕西華批評,「講爽的大家都會」,要務實解決問題,首要應先廢除區域教學醫院
以上的家醫科,部分醫學中心甚至有家醫科病房,這不是擺明了要收輕症患者?
http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20161113000280-260114
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.235.52.175
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1478982039.A.F22.html
推
11/13 04:21, , 1F
11/13 04:21, 1F
噓
11/13 04:22, , 2F
11/13 04:22, 2F
噓
11/13 04:23, , 3F
11/13 04:23, 3F
噓
11/13 04:23, , 4F
11/13 04:23, 4F
→
11/13 04:23, , 5F
11/13 04:23, 5F
→
11/13 04:24, , 6F
11/13 04:24, 6F
噓
11/13 04:24, , 7F
11/13 04:24, 7F
推
11/13 04:24, , 8F
11/13 04:24, 8F
→
11/13 04:25, , 9F
11/13 04:25, 9F
推
11/13 04:25, , 10F
11/13 04:25, 10F
推
11/13 04:26, , 11F
11/13 04:26, 11F
→
11/13 04:26, , 12F
11/13 04:26, 12F
→
11/13 04:26, , 13F
11/13 04:26, 13F
→
11/13 04:26, , 14F
11/13 04:26, 14F
→
11/13 04:26, , 15F
11/13 04:26, 15F
→
11/13 04:27, , 16F
11/13 04:27, 16F
推
11/13 04:27, , 17F
11/13 04:27, 17F
→
11/13 04:27, , 18F
11/13 04:27, 18F
推
11/13 04:28, , 19F
11/13 04:28, 19F
→
11/13 04:28, , 20F
11/13 04:28, 20F
→
11/13 04:28, , 21F
11/13 04:28, 21F
推
11/13 04:28, , 22F
11/13 04:28, 22F
→
11/13 04:30, , 23F
11/13 04:30, 23F
推
11/13 04:32, , 24F
11/13 04:32, 24F
噓
11/13 04:33, , 25F
11/13 04:33, 25F
推
11/13 04:33, , 26F
11/13 04:33, 26F
→
11/13 04:33, , 27F
11/13 04:33, 27F
→
11/13 04:33, , 28F
11/13 04:33, 28F
→
11/13 04:35, , 29F
11/13 04:35, 29F
→
11/13 04:35, , 30F
11/13 04:35, 30F
噓
11/13 04:40, , 31F
11/13 04:40, 31F
→
11/13 04:40, , 32F
11/13 04:40, 32F
噓
11/13 04:43, , 33F
11/13 04:43, 33F
噓
11/13 04:47, , 34F
11/13 04:47, 34F
→
11/13 04:58, , 35F
11/13 04:58, 35F
→
11/13 05:40, , 36F
11/13 05:40, 36F
→
11/13 05:41, , 37F
11/13 05:41, 37F
→
11/13 06:01, , 38F
11/13 06:01, 38F
→
11/13 06:07, , 39F
11/13 06:07, 39F
→
11/13 06:34, , 40F
11/13 06:34, 40F
推
11/13 06:44, , 41F
11/13 06:44, 41F
噓
11/13 06:49, , 42F
11/13 06:49, 42F
→
11/13 06:53, , 43F
11/13 06:53, 43F
推
11/13 06:56, , 44F
11/13 06:56, 44F
噓
11/13 07:25, , 45F
11/13 07:25, 45F
推
11/13 07:31, , 46F
11/13 07:31, 46F
噓
11/13 08:00, , 47F
11/13 08:00, 47F
推
11/13 08:11, , 48F
11/13 08:11, 48F
推
11/13 08:18, , 49F
11/13 08:18, 49F
推
11/13 08:36, , 50F
11/13 08:36, 50F
→
11/13 08:38, , 51F
11/13 08:38, 51F
→
11/13 08:38, , 52F
11/13 08:38, 52F
推
11/13 08:46, , 53F
11/13 08:46, 53F
推
11/13 09:25, , 54F
11/13 09:25, 54F
推
11/13 10:52, , 55F
11/13 10:52, 55F
→
11/13 11:40, , 56F
11/13 11:40, 56F
推
11/13 11:55, , 57F
11/13 11:55, 57F
噓
11/13 14:22, , 58F
11/13 14:22, 58F
→
11/13 14:22, , 59F
11/13 14:22, 59F
→
11/13 14:22, , 60F
11/13 14:22, 60F
→
11/13 14:24, , 61F
11/13 14:24, 61F
→
11/13 14:24, , 62F
11/13 14:24, 62F
→
11/13 22:50, , 63F
11/13 22:50, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):