[新聞] 蕭曉玲復職後去哪教書? 台北市國中家長會聯合會:各大國中都很怕消失
1.新聞來源:
風傳媒
2.新聞標題:
蕭曉玲復職後去哪教書? 台北市國中家長會聯合會:各大國中都很怕
3.新聞內文:
台北市長柯文哲有意推動轉型正義,近期簽文撤銷中山國中蕭曉玲老師的解職案,但此舉
不但引發台北市教育局長湯志民請辭,此外,蕭可不經教師甄試的程序即可回校任職,更
引起國中家長聯合會的反彈。台北市議員鍾小平26日率領國中家長會聯合會眾家長代表開
記者會,指復職的簽文還沒有對蕭發出,家長們已先擔心曾遭判為不適任教師的蕭到學校
任職。
教育局主秘廖文靜表示,目前,撤銷教育局決議讓蕭曉玲去職的文,已經由教育局長湯志
民簽核,柯文哲也已簽文,至於復職的公文,由於事涉中山國中目前並無老師缺額,蕭老
師不可能重回中山國中,因此,教育局要先協助尋找其他有缺老師的學校,他校若沒有缺
,也無法硬塞,得等一切程序完備後,才會簽出復職公文,連同撤銷文一併發給蕭曉玲。
廖文靜表示,本學期已開學,各校老師都已齊備,目前各國中都沒有缺老師的情況,教育
局已組成專案小組溝通,若有找到空缺讓蕭任職,蕭曉玲就「不太適合拒絕」,不過,廖
文靜也提到,由於蕭的復職不需要經過校方的教師甄選程序,可直接入校任教,但若該校
不願意接受蕭,教育局也無法干涉學校自主意識,因此,仍需要很多的溝通協調。
教育界一向被外界視為較為保守的體系,在蕭尚未正式回到學校教書之前,柯文哲的轉型
正義只推到一半,過程中的抗議聲量卻也是此起彼落。
鍾小平今日率領的國中家長會聯合會公開表達,不希望讓蕭曉玲再度入校教書,總會長許
孝仁說,各大國中很怕蕭到學校任職,擔心蕭會被塞到哪個學校,蕭經過當年教學不當的
認定,重新入校後會影響學校的老師、家長、學生。
4.新聞連結
http://www.storm.mg/article/170542
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.144.201
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1474866910.A.861.html
推
09/26 13:15, , 1F
09/26 13:15, 1F
→
09/26 13:16, , 2F
09/26 13:16, 2F
→
09/26 13:16, , 3F
09/26 13:16, 3F
推
09/26 13:16, , 4F
09/26 13:16, 4F
推
09/26 13:16, , 5F
09/26 13:16, 5F
→
09/26 13:16, , 6F
09/26 13:16, 6F
噓
09/26 13:17, , 7F
09/26 13:17, 7F
→
09/26 13:17, , 8F
09/26 13:17, 8F
推
09/26 13:17, , 9F
09/26 13:17, 9F
→
09/26 13:17, , 10F
09/26 13:17, 10F
→
09/26 13:17, , 11F
09/26 13:17, 11F
→
09/26 13:17, , 12F
09/26 13:17, 12F
→
09/26 13:17, , 13F
09/26 13:17, 13F
推
09/26 13:17, , 14F
09/26 13:17, 14F
推
09/26 13:18, , 15F
09/26 13:18, 15F
→
09/26 13:18, , 16F
09/26 13:18, 16F
→
09/26 13:18, , 17F
09/26 13:18, 17F
→
09/26 13:18, , 18F
09/26 13:18, 18F
→
09/26 13:19, , 19F
09/26 13:19, 19F
→
09/26 13:19, , 20F
09/26 13:19, 20F
→
09/26 13:19, , 21F
09/26 13:19, 21F
→
09/26 13:19, , 22F
09/26 13:19, 22F
→
09/26 13:20, , 23F
09/26 13:20, 23F
→
09/26 13:20, , 24F
09/26 13:20, 24F
→
09/26 13:21, , 25F
09/26 13:21, 25F
→
09/26 13:21, , 26F
09/26 13:21, 26F
→
09/26 13:21, , 27F
09/26 13:21, 27F
→
09/26 13:23, , 28F
09/26 13:23, 28F
→
09/26 13:24, , 29F
09/26 13:24, 29F
→
09/26 13:24, , 30F
09/26 13:24, 30F
→
09/26 13:24, , 31F
09/26 13:24, 31F
→
09/26 13:25, , 32F
09/26 13:25, 32F
推
09/26 13:25, , 33F
09/26 13:25, 33F
→
09/26 13:25, , 34F
09/26 13:25, 34F
推
09/26 13:26, , 35F
09/26 13:26, 35F
→
09/26 13:28, , 36F
09/26 13:28, 36F
推
09/26 13:29, , 37F
09/26 13:29, 37F
推
09/26 13:30, , 38F
09/26 13:30, 38F
推
09/26 13:32, , 39F
09/26 13:32, 39F
推
09/26 13:32, , 40F
09/26 13:32, 40F
→
09/26 13:33, , 41F
09/26 13:33, 41F
→
09/26 13:34, , 42F
09/26 13:34, 42F
噓
09/26 13:35, , 43F
09/26 13:35, 43F
推
09/26 13:36, , 44F
09/26 13:36, 44F
推
09/26 13:37, , 45F
09/26 13:37, 45F
→
09/26 13:38, , 46F
09/26 13:38, 46F
推
09/26 13:41, , 47F
09/26 13:41, 47F
噓
09/26 13:43, , 48F
09/26 13:43, 48F
噓
09/26 13:44, , 49F
09/26 13:44, 49F
→
09/26 13:45, , 50F
09/26 13:45, 50F
推
09/26 13:46, , 51F
09/26 13:46, 51F
→
09/26 13:46, , 52F
09/26 13:46, 52F
→
09/26 13:48, , 53F
09/26 13:48, 53F
推
09/26 13:50, , 54F
09/26 13:50, 54F
→
09/26 13:50, , 55F
09/26 13:50, 55F
推
09/26 13:50, , 56F
09/26 13:50, 56F
→
09/26 13:50, , 57F
09/26 13:50, 57F
→
09/26 13:51, , 58F
09/26 13:51, 58F
推
09/26 14:06, , 59F
09/26 14:06, 59F
推
09/26 14:10, , 60F
09/26 14:10, 60F
→
09/26 14:31, , 61F
09/26 14:31, 61F
→
09/26 14:34, , 62F
09/26 14:34, 62F
噓
09/26 14:55, , 63F
09/26 14:55, 63F
→
09/26 14:55, , 64F
09/26 14:55, 64F
推
09/26 15:15, , 65F
09/26 15:15, 65F
→
09/26 15:15, , 66F
09/26 15:15, 66F
噓
09/26 17:27, , 67F
09/26 17:27, 67F
噓
09/27 17:27, , 68F
09/27 17:27, 68F
→
09/27 17:28, , 69F
09/27 17:28, 69F
推
09/27 17:28, , 70F
09/27 17:28, 70F
→
09/27 17:28, , 71F
09/27 17:28, 71F
→
09/27 17:29, , 72F
09/27 17:29, 72F
→
09/27 17:29, , 73F
09/27 17:29, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):