[新聞] 北市藍議員踢爆 柯P都發局長林洲民嗆:10個議員、9個瞧不起消失
1.媒體來源:
自由
2.完整新聞標題:
北市藍議員踢爆 柯P都發局長林洲民嗆:10個議員、9個瞧不起
3.完整新聞內文:
〔記者何世昌/台北報導〕台北市議會今天開議第2天,台北市長柯文哲赴市議會進行施
政報告。施政報告前,國民黨市議員汪志冰爆料,都發局長林洲民藐視市議會及市議員,
曾在都發局務會議內撂話:「台北市議會,十個議員,有九個以上我瞧不起!」汪志冰的
爆料引發一陣騷動,藍綠議員均不滿,要求主席查證此事。
施政報告前,市議員不分藍綠提出權益問題,經主席裁示每名議員可先發言4分鐘。
國民黨市議員汪志冰表示,包含楊芳玲昨日提出辭呈,已有12名一級首長請辭;她酸,北
市府若要組棒球隊,9人上場,還有3人能在牛棚練投。
此語令柯文哲不禁失笑。汪志冰不滿批評,這樣的領導風格,柯市長還笑得出來,我真的
很佩服!她說,12名一級首長紛紛掛官離去,是凸顯朕意凌駕專業問題;還留任的首長,
不知道還有多少是「同床異夢」?
汪還說,除了領導出問題,團隊成員也大有問題。她進一步爆料,8月中旬,某次都發局
務會議,針對市議會關切的案子進行討論,有幕僚建議局長林洲民親自出面向市議員說明
;不料,林洲民向幕僚說:「不必,不用,台北市議會,10個議員,有9個以上我瞧不起
。」
此語令在場藍、綠議員嘩然。柯文哲聞訊後則頻頻後望坐後排的林洲民。對此,汪志冰要
求議長吳碧珠,在市長柯文哲正式登台進行施政報告前,查證此事;若確有其事,務必要
求柯文哲公開道歉!汪最後不忘更提醒,若府會關係持續惡劣,柯的前途堪慮。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1831428
5.備註:
不能說實話阿
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.246.65.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1474368585.A.541.html
推
09/20 18:50, , 1F
09/20 18:50, 1F
推
09/20 18:50, , 2F
09/20 18:50, 2F
噓
09/20 18:50, , 3F
09/20 18:50, 3F
→
09/20 18:50, , 4F
09/20 18:50, 4F
推
09/20 18:50, , 5F
09/20 18:50, 5F
→
09/20 18:51, , 6F
09/20 18:51, 6F
→
09/20 18:51, , 7F
09/20 18:51, 7F
推
09/20 18:51, , 8F
09/20 18:51, 8F
→
09/20 18:51, , 9F
09/20 18:51, 9F
推
09/20 18:51, , 10F
09/20 18:51, 10F
推
09/20 18:51, , 11F
09/20 18:51, 11F
→
09/20 18:51, , 12F
09/20 18:51, 12F
→
09/20 18:51, , 13F
09/20 18:51, 13F
推
09/20 18:51, , 14F
09/20 18:51, 14F
→
09/20 18:52, , 15F
09/20 18:52, 15F
噓
09/20 18:52, , 16F
09/20 18:52, 16F
→
09/20 18:52, , 17F
09/20 18:52, 17F
→
09/20 18:52, , 18F
09/20 18:52, 18F
推
09/20 18:52, , 19F
09/20 18:52, 19F
→
09/20 18:52, , 20F
09/20 18:52, 20F
→
09/20 18:52, , 21F
09/20 18:52, 21F
推
09/20 18:52, , 22F
09/20 18:52, 22F
※ sunyeah:轉錄至看板 HatePolitics 09/20 18:52
推
09/20 18:52, , 23F
09/20 18:52, 23F
推
09/20 18:53, , 24F
09/20 18:53, 24F
→
09/20 18:53, , 25F
09/20 18:53, 25F
噓
09/20 18:53, , 26F
09/20 18:53, 26F
推
09/20 18:53, , 27F
09/20 18:53, 27F
推
09/20 18:53, , 28F
09/20 18:53, 28F
推
09/20 18:54, , 29F
09/20 18:54, 29F
→
09/20 18:54, , 30F
09/20 18:54, 30F
→
09/20 18:54, , 31F
09/20 18:54, 31F
→
09/20 18:54, , 32F
09/20 18:54, 32F
推
09/20 18:55, , 33F
09/20 18:55, 33F
推
09/20 18:55, , 34F
09/20 18:55, 34F
→
09/20 18:55, , 35F
09/20 18:55, 35F
推
09/20 18:55, , 36F
09/20 18:55, 36F
推
09/20 18:55, , 37F
09/20 18:55, 37F
推
09/20 18:55, , 38F
09/20 18:55, 38F
還有 513 則推文
推
09/21 06:50, , 552F
09/21 06:50, 552F
推
09/21 06:56, , 553F
09/21 06:56, 553F
推
09/21 07:28, , 554F
09/21 07:28, 554F
推
09/21 07:37, , 555F
09/21 07:37, 555F
推
09/21 08:03, , 556F
09/21 08:03, 556F
推
09/21 08:17, , 557F
09/21 08:17, 557F
推
09/21 08:24, , 558F
09/21 08:24, 558F
推
09/21 08:24, , 559F
09/21 08:24, 559F
推
09/21 08:34, , 560F
09/21 08:34, 560F
推
09/21 08:42, , 561F
09/21 08:42, 561F
推
09/21 08:47, , 562F
09/21 08:47, 562F
推
09/21 08:52, , 563F
09/21 08:52, 563F
推
09/21 09:11, , 564F
09/21 09:11, 564F
推
09/21 09:49, , 565F
09/21 09:49, 565F
→
09/21 09:49, , 566F
09/21 09:49, 566F
→
09/21 09:49, , 567F
09/21 09:49, 567F
推
09/21 09:51, , 568F
09/21 09:51, 568F
推
09/21 10:54, , 569F
09/21 10:54, 569F
推
09/21 11:12, , 570F
09/21 11:12, 570F
推
09/21 11:23, , 571F
09/21 11:23, 571F
推
09/21 11:40, , 572F
09/21 11:40, 572F
推
09/21 12:03, , 573F
09/21 12:03, 573F
推
09/21 12:05, , 574F
09/21 12:05, 574F
噓
09/21 12:14, , 575F
09/21 12:14, 575F
推
09/21 12:59, , 576F
09/21 12:59, 576F
推
09/21 13:16, , 577F
09/21 13:16, 577F
推
09/21 13:28, , 578F
09/21 13:28, 578F
推
09/21 14:33, , 579F
09/21 14:33, 579F
推
09/21 14:47, , 580F
09/21 14:47, 580F
推
09/21 15:04, , 581F
09/21 15:04, 581F
推
09/21 15:20, , 582F
09/21 15:20, 582F
推
09/21 15:40, , 583F
09/21 15:40, 583F
推
09/21 15:47, , 584F
09/21 15:47, 584F
推
09/21 15:52, , 585F
09/21 15:52, 585F
推
09/21 22:14, , 586F
09/21 22:14, 586F
→
09/21 22:14, , 587F
09/21 22:14, 587F
推
09/21 22:32, , 588F
09/21 22:32, 588F
推
09/22 00:21, , 589F
09/22 00:21, 589F
推
09/22 13:01, , 590F
09/22 13:01, 590F
噓
09/23 08:43, , 591F
09/23 08:43, 591F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):