[新聞] 華航又要換制服? 空姐反映易「激凸」消失
自由時報
華航又要換制服? 空姐反映易「激凸」
2016-09-03 10:39
〔即時新聞/綜合報導〕日前傳出華航又要換新制服,華航表示,目前沒有定案是否要更
換;有媒體報導,華航新制服因剪裁關係容易出現「激凸」,有男乘客還會寫字條提醒空
姐,讓空姐尷尬,這也是員工想換新制服的原因之一。
外傳華航新制服因剪裁關係容易出現「激凸」,有男乘客還會寫字條提醒空姐,讓空姐相
當尷尬。(資料照)
《蘋果日報》報導,華航新制服因剪裁關係容易出現「激凸」,還空姐收到乘客的提醒,
讓她們相當尷尬,現在華航新團隊上任,不少員工提議再換新制服。華航董事長何煖軒坦
言,有收到空服員換新制服的建議,不過由於更換新制服需要一大筆經費,所以還再評估
。
本報報導,華航總經理謝世謙昨也說,有接到空服員反映制服問題,會把制服問題列入討
論評估,不過換不換目前尚未定案
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1814700
有人要一起去搭華航嗎??? 開團出國玩囉~~
--
http://imgur.com/ZqtaFGQ
![](https://i.imgur.com/ZqtaFGQ.jpg)
![](https://i.imgur.com/IxTVLu0.jpg)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.161.35.225
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1472873305.A.F5C.html
→
09/03 11:28, , 1F
09/03 11:28, 1F
推
09/03 11:29, , 2F
09/03 11:29, 2F
推
09/03 11:29, , 3F
09/03 11:29, 3F
推
09/03 11:29, , 4F
09/03 11:29, 4F
→
09/03 11:29, , 5F
09/03 11:29, 5F
推
09/03 11:29, , 6F
09/03 11:29, 6F
推
09/03 11:29, , 7F
09/03 11:29, 7F
→
09/03 11:29, , 8F
09/03 11:29, 8F
→
09/03 11:30, , 9F
09/03 11:30, 9F
→
09/03 11:30, , 10F
09/03 11:30, 10F
推
09/03 11:30, , 11F
09/03 11:30, 11F
噓
09/03 11:30, , 12F
09/03 11:30, 12F
推
09/03 11:30, , 13F
09/03 11:30, 13F
推
09/03 11:30, , 14F
09/03 11:30, 14F
→
09/03 11:30, , 15F
09/03 11:30, 15F
噓
09/03 11:30, , 16F
09/03 11:30, 16F
→
09/03 11:31, , 17F
09/03 11:31, 17F
→
09/03 11:31, , 18F
09/03 11:31, 18F
→
09/03 11:31, , 19F
09/03 11:31, 19F
推
09/03 11:32, , 20F
09/03 11:32, 20F
推
09/03 11:32, , 21F
09/03 11:32, 21F
→
09/03 11:32, , 22F
09/03 11:32, 22F
→
09/03 11:32, , 23F
09/03 11:32, 23F
推
09/03 11:32, , 24F
09/03 11:32, 24F
推
09/03 11:34, , 25F
09/03 11:34, 25F
推
09/03 11:34, , 26F
09/03 11:34, 26F
→
09/03 11:34, , 27F
09/03 11:34, 27F
噓
09/03 11:34, , 28F
09/03 11:34, 28F
推
09/03 11:35, , 29F
09/03 11:35, 29F
推
09/03 11:35, , 30F
09/03 11:35, 30F
推
09/03 11:36, , 31F
09/03 11:36, 31F
→
09/03 11:36, , 32F
09/03 11:36, 32F
推
09/03 11:36, , 33F
09/03 11:36, 33F
→
09/03 11:36, , 34F
09/03 11:36, 34F
推
09/03 11:37, , 35F
09/03 11:37, 35F
→
09/03 11:38, , 36F
09/03 11:38, 36F
推
09/03 11:38, , 37F
09/03 11:38, 37F
噓
09/03 11:38, , 38F
09/03 11:38, 38F
推
09/03 11:39, , 39F
09/03 11:39, 39F
推
09/03 11:39, , 40F
09/03 11:39, 40F
推
09/03 11:40, , 41F
09/03 11:40, 41F
噓
09/03 11:40, , 42F
09/03 11:40, 42F
→
09/03 11:41, , 43F
09/03 11:41, 43F
推
09/03 11:43, , 44F
09/03 11:43, 44F
推
09/03 11:43, , 45F
09/03 11:43, 45F
推
09/03 11:46, , 46F
09/03 11:46, 46F
推
09/03 11:48, , 47F
09/03 11:48, 47F
噓
09/03 11:48, , 48F
09/03 11:48, 48F
→
09/03 11:50, , 49F
09/03 11:50, 49F
→
09/03 11:51, , 50F
09/03 11:51, 50F
推
09/03 11:51, , 51F
09/03 11:51, 51F
推
09/03 11:51, , 52F
09/03 11:51, 52F
推
09/03 11:53, , 53F
09/03 11:53, 53F
推
09/03 11:53, , 54F
09/03 11:53, 54F
推
09/03 11:56, , 55F
09/03 11:56, 55F
推
09/03 11:57, , 56F
09/03 11:57, 56F
推
09/03 12:00, , 57F
09/03 12:00, 57F
→
09/03 12:13, , 58F
09/03 12:13, 58F
推
09/03 12:13, , 59F
09/03 12:13, 59F
噓
09/03 12:13, , 60F
09/03 12:13, 60F
噓
09/03 12:23, , 61F
09/03 12:23, 61F
推
09/03 12:31, , 62F
09/03 12:31, 62F
推
09/03 12:37, , 63F
09/03 12:37, 63F
推
09/03 12:37, , 64F
09/03 12:37, 64F
→
09/03 12:43, , 65F
09/03 12:43, 65F
推
09/03 12:56, , 66F
09/03 12:56, 66F
推
09/03 13:06, , 67F
09/03 13:06, 67F
噓
09/03 13:12, , 68F
09/03 13:12, 68F
推
09/03 13:13, , 69F
09/03 13:13, 69F
推
09/03 13:13, , 70F
09/03 13:13, 70F
→
09/03 13:14, , 71F
09/03 13:14, 71F
推
09/03 13:16, , 72F
09/03 13:16, 72F
推
09/03 13:28, , 73F
09/03 13:28, 73F
推
09/03 13:53, , 74F
09/03 13:53, 74F
推
09/03 14:28, , 75F
09/03 14:28, 75F
噓
09/03 17:08, , 76F
09/03 17:08, 76F
噓
09/03 23:26, , 77F
09/03 23:26, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):