Fw: [情報] 接下來南海上場的是越南VS中國消失

看板Gossiping作者selina0508時間8年前 (2016/07/14 22:15)推噓7(7推 0噓 3→)

留言10則, 10人參與討論串1/1

※ [本文轉錄自 PublicIssue 看板 #1NXvikj7 ]作者: Cityfrighten (中二魯叔) 看板: PublicIssue標題: [情報] 接下來南海上場的是越南VS中國時間: Thu Jul 14 22:01:16 2016forbes連結http://goo.gl/Ga9udi以下是外電的內容與翻譯China Vs. Vietnam: Next Up At The International Court On The South China SeaNow that the Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration voted resoundingly inPhilippines’ favor on the South China Sea, it is Vietnam’s turn to bring anarbitration case. China has interfered massively in Vietnam’s economicdevelopment — not only against its fishing, but against its offshore oil andgas exploration and extraction. China justifies its interference in Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) based on China’s recently-claimed 9-dashline — the same 1930s line that the Court invalidated yesterday in thePhilippine legal victory.在海牙國際常駐仲裁法庭判菲律賓勝訴後，接下來換越南提出仲裁案。　中國不僅嚴重地干擾影響了越南的漁業，且其離岸油氣的探勘與採礦。　中國長久以來以１９３０年代所繪的９段線地圖來正當化中國對於越南ＥＥＺ的侵犯。In 2012, China cut the cables of seismic equipment used by Vietnam to exploreits own EEZ for oil and gas. Starting in 2014, China repeatedly explored foroil within Vietnam’s 200 nautical mile EEZ, with its high-tech $1 billion HS981 drilling rig. Subsidized Chinese steel-hulled boats regularly sink woodenVietnamese fishing boats in disputed areas of the South China Sea, mostrecently last weekend. In what the Vietnamese describe as a “merciless andpitiless” incident, Chinese boats tried to prevent rescuers from retrievingfishermen thrown overboard.在２０１２年，中國為了探勘油氣採礦將越南海底的地震偵測纜線剪斷。從２０１４年開始，中國一再的在越南的２００海浬的ＥＥＺ內，使用其價值１０億的HS 981鑽探平台來尋找石油。在爭議海域中，中國籍政府所補助的鐵殼船也經常弄沉越南籍的木製漁船，而最近一起事故發生於上周。在此越南人的描述為唯一起殘忍且冷血的事件，中國船隻還試圖阻止搜救者救起落海的漁民。With the Court’s ruling yesterday, nothing stops Vietnam from bringing asimilar arbitration case against China — and getting an almost certain win.Vietnam has done a great job of patching up its differences with countriesmore reasonable than China. Vietnam even submitted a joint submission withMalaysia on their shared continental shelf — a model of cooperation andreason. Vietnam still claims all of the Spratlys and Paracel Islands, but onesenses none of the stridency and intensity regarding these claims that wasexhibited by China on their 9-dash line claim.加上昨天國際法庭裁決後，已經沒有甚麼事可以阻止越南對中國提出類似的強制仲裁，越方也認為可以勝訴。　越南對許多比中國講理，之前有歧異的國家的彌補關係上做了很好的工作。越南甚至提交了一份與馬來西亞共享大陸棚的計畫，可以說是合作與理性的典範。越南仍然主張擁有南沙與西沙島嶼，但仍然比不上中國刺耳與霸道的主張九段線。My prediction is that Vietnamese leaders simply want — and will soonpetition — the Court to ascertain the limits of their EEZ, based on 200nautical miles from the coastline, plus additional continental shelf. Oncethis is settled, Vietnam will be theoretically free to fully utilize its EEZ.作者預估越南領導人最近將會像國際法庭遞交確認２００海浬的ＥＥＺ範圍及大陸棚的申請。一旦這個裁決確認後，越南理論上將能完全自由的使用其ＥＥＺ。Enforcement of Vietnam’s claim is another matter. China’s reaction to thePhilippine’s successful case over the coming months will help Vietnam knowwhat to expect after a new ruling in its favor. But there is now every reasonfor Vietnam to bring an arbitration case. As President Rodrigo Duterte of thePhilippines discovered, there is no reason to bargain with China prior to aPCA ruling, as the PCA ruling strengthened the bargaining position of thePhilippines. China knew this, which is why China was so desperate forbilateral negotiations prior to yesterday’s ruling. Vietnam’s bargainingposition with China will be similarly strengthened by bringing a case andreceiving a ruling from the Hague tribunal. Let’s hope Vietnam now takesaction.越南主張的執行而是另外一回事。在菲律賓狀告中國成功勝訴的案例將會幫助越南了解如何勝訴。但對越南來說現在絕對有理由提起仲裁。如同菲律賓總統Rodrigo Duterte發現，在PCA仲裁前，根本沒有需要跟中國討價還價，因為PCA裁決鞏固了菲律賓討價還價的空間。中國也知道這件事，這也是中國在裁決前，如此絕望的希望私下的雙邊談判來解決這件事。藉由提起強制仲裁案，越南對中國的討價空間將來也會增加且獲得海牙國際仲裁庭的裁決。讓我們期待未來越南的行動吧。---以下這個部分為先前彭博Bloomberg的新聞內容，可以搭配參考。Vietnam disputes China’s claim to the Paracel Islands, which China hasoccupied since 1974. Sixty-four Vietnamese sailors died in a 1988 naval clashbetween Vietnam and China near Johnson South Reef.http://imgur.com/cDvogbOParacel

Islands（西沙群島）為越南與中國的領土主張紛爭，而中國自從１９４７佔領至今。　６４位越南水手曾死於１９８８年越南與中國在Johnson South Reef（赤瓜礁）的海上軍事衝突。Brunei and Malaysia also claim maritime boundaries in the Sea. Malaysiaoperates several military outposts in the Spratlys. Brunei has claims toseveral reefs, but occupies no territory.http://imgur.com/cw5rstc

汶萊與馬來西亞也在此部分海域宣稱擁有海上邊界。　馬來西亞在Spratlys（南沙）擁有軍事據點並實質控制。　而汶萊則主張其中幾個珊瑚礁，但並未佔領任何區域。The South China Sea is a vital thoroughfare for the global economy. Home to10% of the world’s commercial ocean fish stock, the sea lies above anestimated 11 billion barrels in oil reserves.http://imgur.com/rZNns9M--

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.158.178※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1468504878.A.B47.html※ 編輯: Cityfrighten (220.137.158.178), 07/14/2016 22:03:25※ 編輯: Cityfrighten (220.137.158.178), 07/14/2016 22:06:55

推

yudi1991

07/14 22:14, , 1^F

07/14 22:14, 1^F

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)※ 轉錄者: selina0508 (1.164.18.185), 07/14/2016 22:15:25

→

ricklay1225

07/14 22:17, , 2^F

07/14 22:17, 2^F

→

arnold3

07/14 22:19, , 3^F