[新聞]戰爭邊緣? 蔡正元再爆雄三飛彈射向廈門消失
資料來源:蘋果
連結:http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/politics/20160702/899314/
第一時間爆料誤射雄三飛彈事件的國民黨政策會執行長蔡正元,上午在臉書以「戰爭邊緣
」為題發文說,長久以來綠營政客和名嘴,為了鼓吹台獨,不斷自我麻醉不斷催眠綠民,
說兩岸不會有戰爭;飛彈誤射事件,卻無情的摧毀這層美夢,逼得這群綠人,要面對殘酷
的現實世界。
蔡正元說,飛彈誤射後,國軍高層立即進駐衡山,對岸飛彈雷達立即起動,這就是戰爭邊
緣,若非漁船擋住飛彈,今天的台灣島,可能已是完全不同了。他認為,誤射的飛彈明顯
的飛向廈門市,結果如何,大家心理有數,而廈門、高雄軍港、高雄市政府,剛好在一條
直線上,兩岸飛彈系統一啟動,結果又會如何,大家更不能裝傻。
蔡正元說,高雄市長陳菊和她的官員,這個時候才應該說「這不是海軍說了算!」而不是
講一些「素質低劣的五四三」,但是看那群綠色政客、綠媒、綠嘴,驚慌失措,胡言亂語
的舉錯,可以很快下結論,「台灣在綠色執政及綠媒當道下只有越來越危險!」(政治中
心/台北報導)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.171.169.206
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1467429036.A.554.html
噓
07/02 11:11, , 1F
07/02 11:11, 1F
推
07/02 11:11, , 2F
07/02 11:11, 2F
噓
07/02 11:11, , 3F
07/02 11:11, 3F
推
07/02 11:11, , 4F
07/02 11:11, 4F
噓
07/02 11:11, , 5F
07/02 11:11, 5F
噓
07/02 11:11, , 6F
07/02 11:11, 6F
噓
07/02 11:11, , 7F
07/02 11:11, 7F
推
07/02 11:11, , 8F
07/02 11:11, 8F
推
07/02 11:11, , 9F
07/02 11:11, 9F
噓
07/02 11:12, , 10F
07/02 11:12, 10F
噓
07/02 11:12, , 11F
07/02 11:12, 11F
噓
07/02 11:12, , 12F
07/02 11:12, 12F
噓
07/02 11:12, , 13F
07/02 11:12, 13F
噓
07/02 11:12, , 14F
07/02 11:12, 14F
→
07/02 11:12, , 15F
07/02 11:12, 15F
→
07/02 11:12, , 16F
07/02 11:12, 16F
→
07/02 11:12, , 17F
07/02 11:12, 17F
推
07/02 11:13, , 18F
07/02 11:13, 18F
推
07/02 11:13, , 19F
07/02 11:13, 19F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 20F
07/02 11:13, 20F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 21F
07/02 11:13, 21F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 22F
07/02 11:13, 22F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 23F
07/02 11:13, 23F
→
07/02 11:13, , 24F
07/02 11:13, 24F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 25F
07/02 11:13, 25F
噓
07/02 11:13, , 26F
07/02 11:13, 26F
→
07/02 11:14, , 27F
07/02 11:14, 27F
→
07/02 11:14, , 28F
07/02 11:14, 28F
→
07/02 11:14, , 29F
07/02 11:14, 29F
噓
07/02 11:14, , 30F
07/02 11:14, 30F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 31F
07/02 11:15, 31F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 32F
07/02 11:15, 32F
→
07/02 11:15, , 33F
07/02 11:15, 33F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 34F
07/02 11:15, 34F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 35F
07/02 11:15, 35F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 36F
07/02 11:15, 36F
噓
07/02 11:15, , 37F
07/02 11:15, 37F
→
07/02 11:15, , 38F
07/02 11:15, 38F
推
07/02 11:16, , 39F
07/02 11:16, 39F
還有 45 則推文
推
07/02 11:32, , 85F
07/02 11:32, 85F
噓
07/02 11:32, , 86F
07/02 11:32, 86F
噓
07/02 11:32, , 87F
07/02 11:32, 87F
推
07/02 11:33, , 88F
07/02 11:33, 88F
→
07/02 11:34, , 89F
07/02 11:34, 89F
噓
07/02 11:34, , 90F
07/02 11:34, 90F
→
07/02 11:35, , 91F
07/02 11:35, 91F
噓
07/02 11:36, , 92F
07/02 11:36, 92F
噓
07/02 11:38, , 93F
07/02 11:38, 93F
噓
07/02 11:39, , 94F
07/02 11:39, 94F
噓
07/02 11:42, , 95F
07/02 11:42, 95F
噓
07/02 11:44, , 96F
07/02 11:44, 96F
噓
07/02 11:45, , 97F
07/02 11:45, 97F
噓
07/02 11:47, , 98F
07/02 11:47, 98F
推
07/02 11:47, , 99F
07/02 11:47, 99F
噓
07/02 11:48, , 100F
07/02 11:48, 100F
噓
07/02 11:49, , 101F
07/02 11:49, 101F
噓
07/02 11:50, , 102F
07/02 11:50, 102F
噓
07/02 11:51, , 103F
07/02 11:51, 103F
推
07/02 11:52, , 104F
07/02 11:52, 104F
噓
07/02 11:53, , 105F
07/02 11:53, 105F
噓
07/02 11:59, , 106F
07/02 11:59, 106F
噓
07/02 12:01, , 107F
07/02 12:01, 107F
推
07/02 12:05, , 108F
07/02 12:05, 108F
噓
07/02 12:15, , 109F
07/02 12:15, 109F
噓
07/02 12:16, , 110F
07/02 12:16, 110F
噓
07/02 12:17, , 111F
07/02 12:17, 111F
噓
07/02 12:27, , 112F
07/02 12:27, 112F
噓
07/02 12:40, , 113F
07/02 12:40, 113F
→
07/02 12:41, , 114F
07/02 12:41, 114F
噓
07/02 12:46, , 115F
07/02 12:46, 115F
→
07/02 12:47, , 116F
07/02 12:47, 116F
噓
07/02 12:48, , 117F
07/02 12:48, 117F
→
07/02 12:55, , 118F
07/02 12:55, 118F
噓
07/02 13:13, , 119F
07/02 13:13, 119F
噓
07/02 13:51, , 120F
07/02 13:51, 120F
噓
07/02 18:32, , 121F
07/02 18:32, 121F
噓
07/02 20:15, , 122F
07/02 20:15, 122F
噓
07/03 02:26, , 123F
07/03 02:26, 123F
噓
07/03 09:38, , 124F
07/03 09:38, 124F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):