[問卦] 為什麼反廢死的人臉皮那麼厚?消失
受害家屬不表示意見的時候,就預設受害家屬想要加害人死。
受害家屬要原諒加害人時(原諒不是指無罪釋放,只是覺得不用死),就開始抹黑受害家屬。
當有人表示應該討論結構性問題時,一堆假中立的反廢死就會跳出來說兩者不能併行嗎?
但是經過了這麼多次隨機殺人事件,假中立認為的兩者併行只有死刑還在,檢討制度的部
分完全沒有動靜他們完全不在意。但是只要死刑的存廢一被討論,他們又會跳出來兩者不
能併行嗎?
受害家屬覺得廢不廢死不是現階段該討論的,現在應該檢討台灣為什麼會變得如此不安全。
因為不符合反廢死心中的想像,就開始靠北被害家屬,這已經不是你家的問題,是整個社
會的問題。
為什麼反廢死的臉皮會那麼厚?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.25.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1459232389.A.289.html
推
03/29 14:20, , 1F
03/29 14:20, 1F
→
03/29 14:20, , 2F
03/29 14:20, 2F
→
03/29 14:20, , 3F
03/29 14:20, 3F
推
03/29 14:20, , 4F
03/29 14:20, 4F
→
03/29 14:20, , 5F
03/29 14:20, 5F
→
03/29 14:21, , 6F
03/29 14:21, 6F
→
03/29 14:21, , 7F
03/29 14:21, 7F
噓
03/29 14:21, , 8F
03/29 14:21, 8F
推
03/29 14:21, , 9F
03/29 14:21, 9F
推
03/29 14:21, , 10F
03/29 14:21, 10F
噓
03/29 14:21, , 11F
03/29 14:21, 11F
推
03/29 14:21, , 12F
03/29 14:21, 12F
→
03/29 14:21, , 13F
03/29 14:21, 13F
噓
03/29 14:21, , 14F
03/29 14:21, 14F
噓
03/29 14:21, , 15F
03/29 14:21, 15F
推
03/29 14:21, , 16F
03/29 14:21, 16F
→
03/29 14:22, , 17F
03/29 14:22, 17F
→
03/29 14:22, , 18F
03/29 14:22, 18F
→
03/29 14:22, , 19F
03/29 14:22, 19F
噓
03/29 14:22, , 20F
03/29 14:22, 20F
還有 23 則推文
還有 22 段內文
→
03/29 14:32, , 44F
03/29 14:32, 44F
推
03/29 14:33, , 45F
03/29 14:33, 45F
→
03/29 14:33, , 46F
03/29 14:33, 46F
→
03/29 14:35, , 47F
03/29 14:35, 47F
噓
03/29 14:37, , 48F
03/29 14:37, 48F
噓
03/29 14:38, , 49F
03/29 14:38, 49F
噓
03/29 14:40, , 50F
03/29 14:40, 50F
→
03/29 14:40, , 51F
03/29 14:40, 51F
噓
03/29 14:42, , 52F
03/29 14:42, 52F
推
03/29 14:42, , 53F
03/29 14:42, 53F
噓
03/29 14:42, , 54F
03/29 14:42, 54F
噓
03/29 14:48, , 55F
03/29 14:48, 55F
噓
03/29 15:01, , 56F
03/29 15:01, 56F
推
03/29 15:04, , 57F
03/29 15:04, 57F
噓
03/29 15:28, , 58F
03/29 15:28, 58F
噓
03/29 15:57, , 59F
03/29 15:57, 59F
→
03/29 16:25, , 60F
03/29 16:25, 60F
推
03/29 17:53, , 61F
03/29 17:53, 61F
推
03/29 21:11, , 62F
03/29 21:11, 62F
推
03/31 01:27, , 63F
03/31 01:27, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):