[問卦] 地下室越多層 房子會越不容易倒嗎消失
我不知道這樣想對不對
如果說
撇除房子有偷工減料
一棟大樓的地下室越多層
會不會就越不容易倒塌
因為地下室多層
代表地基打得深
還是說
一樣會倒啊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 117.19.163.36
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1454956635.A.2FA.html
推
02/09 02:37, , 1F
02/09 02:37, 1F
→
02/09 02:37, , 2F
02/09 02:37, 2F
→
02/09 02:38, , 3F
02/09 02:38, 3F
推
02/09 02:38, , 4F
02/09 02:38, 4F
靠北 也是 問題是要怎麼住那麼多人?
→
02/09 02:38, , 5F
02/09 02:38, 5F
惡靈古堡?
推
02/09 02:38, , 6F
02/09 02:38, 6F
→
02/09 02:39, , 7F
02/09 02:39, 7F
推
02/09 02:39, , 8F
02/09 02:39, 8F
※ 編輯: anthony13015 (117.19.163.36), 02/09/2016 02:40:42
推
02/09 02:40, , 9F
02/09 02:40, 9F
→
02/09 02:40, , 10F
02/09 02:40, 10F
→
02/09 02:40, , 11F
02/09 02:40, 11F
問題是沒辦法住那麼多人啊
→
02/09 02:41, , 12F
02/09 02:41, 12F
推
02/09 02:41, , 13F
02/09 02:41, 13F
最安全就不會拍那麼多集了
※ 編輯: anthony13015 (117.19.163.36), 02/09/2016 02:42:18
推
02/09 02:42, , 14F
02/09 02:42, 14F
這我知道 所以我才問地下室越多 是不是越穩
推
02/09 02:43, , 15F
02/09 02:43, 15F
→
02/09 02:43, , 16F
02/09 02:43, 16F
不一定浪費錢吧
畢竟一個車位也要好幾百萬
一層地下室隨便都超過10個車位
也快一間房子了
※ 編輯: anthony13015 (117.19.163.36), 02/09/2016 02:44:09
推
02/09 02:44, , 17F
02/09 02:44, 17F
→
02/09 02:45, , 18F
02/09 02:45, 18F
→
02/09 02:45, , 19F
02/09 02:45, 19F
→
02/09 02:46, , 20F
02/09 02:46, 20F
還有 26 則推文
還有 25 段內文
→
02/09 03:11, , 47F
02/09 03:11, 47F
推
02/09 03:11, , 48F
02/09 03:11, 48F
→
02/09 03:13, , 49F
02/09 03:13, 49F
也是
推
02/09 03:13, , 50F
02/09 03:13, 50F
※ 編輯: anthony13015 (117.19.163.36), 02/09/2016 03:14:35
推
02/09 03:14, , 51F
02/09 03:14, 51F
一個車位.....
※ 編輯: anthony13015 (117.19.163.36), 02/09/2016 03:15:39
→
02/09 03:40, , 52F
02/09 03:40, 52F
→
02/09 03:41, , 53F
02/09 03:41, 53F
推
02/09 03:41, , 54F
02/09 03:41, 54F
→
02/09 03:41, , 55F
02/09 03:41, 55F
推
02/09 03:50, , 56F
02/09 03:50, 56F
推
02/09 04:15, , 57F
02/09 04:15, 57F
噓
02/09 04:58, , 58F
02/09 04:58, 58F
推
02/09 05:42, , 59F
02/09 05:42, 59F
推
02/09 06:40, , 60F
02/09 06:40, 60F
推
02/09 07:34, , 61F
02/09 07:34, 61F
推
02/09 08:04, , 62F
02/09 08:04, 62F
推
02/09 09:41, , 63F
02/09 09:41, 63F
推
02/09 09:51, , 64F
02/09 09:51, 64F
推
02/09 11:02, , 65F
02/09 11:02, 65F
→
02/09 11:26, , 66F
02/09 11:26, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):