[新聞] 經濟學人: 亞洲藝人難為消失
1.媒體來源:
經濟學人
2.完整新聞標題:
Twice bitten
Youngsters pay a high price for their stardom
Jan 23rd 2016 | SEOUL, TAIPEI AND TOKYO
亞洲藝人難為
3.完整新聞內文:
[節錄]
MILLIONS in Taiwan woke up on election day to a video of a 16-year-old pop
star, Chou Tzu-yu, making an abject apology. Her sin had been to seem to back
Taiwan’s independence, by flaunting its national flag on television. “There
’s only one China,” she parroted in the video. It smacked of a lynching and
did no harm to Tsai Ing-wen with her call for Taiwan to distance itself from
China, whose hand many saw in the bullying.
台灣藝人周子瑜給所屬的韓國經紀公司要求為揮舞台灣國旗道歉,錄了段聲明
一個中國原則的短片。
Like the Japanese companies they mimic, South Korea’s talent agencies have a
fearsome reputation for controlling their young stars. In 2014 the government
set new rules to protect underage recruits. Many endure years-long boot
camps, living in dormitories; many have to undergo plastic surgery.
韓國演藝圈以精實嚴格聞名。
Also dragged to say sorry this week were the five, now middle-aged, members
of Japan’s most popular boy band, SMAP. They scotched rumours of a split,
but the terseness of their apology for “causing trouble” made it clear they
were not there entirely by choice. SMAP’s agency, Johnny & Associates, has
for years been dogged by accusations that it exploits its young charges,
commercially and even sexually. Japanese television depends heavily on the
roster of stars it and other entertainment companies provide, and so is
suspected of turning a blind eye to their excesses.
日本中年偶像SMAP站出來宣稱不解散,不過口氣彷彿不太甘願。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://tinyurl.com/gr98hcs (http://www.economist.com/news/asia/
21688929-youngsters-pay-high-price-their-stardom-twice-bitten )
5.備註:
1) 世界的子瑜~ 可能他們小編覺得要比中年偶像要上相點吧?
2) 一篇文激怒台日韓中四國人?留言區已經有韓國人先砲了~
--
Dire Straits - Sultans Of Swing (Alchemy Live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8Pa9x9fZBtY
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.43.105.147
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1453552250.A.0F8.html
→
01/23 20:31, , 1F
01/23 20:31, 1F
噓
01/23 20:31, , 2F
01/23 20:31, 2F
推
01/23 20:31, , 3F
01/23 20:31, 3F
→
01/23 20:31, , 4F
01/23 20:31, 4F
推
01/23 20:38, , 5F
01/23 20:38, 5F
噓
01/23 20:39, , 6F
01/23 20:39, 6F
→
01/23 20:41, , 7F
01/23 20:41, 7F
→
01/23 20:47, , 8F
01/23 20:47, 8F
→
01/23 23:02, , 9F
01/23 23:02, 9F
推
01/23 23:31, , 10F
01/23 23:31, 10F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):