[問題] 機體戰力與駕駛員「本身」戰力的關聯?
機動武鬥傳不列入討論(╯‵皿′)╯︵╧═╧
駕駛員要身強體建才能充分發揮機體性能這點是沒有什麼問題
既然是士兵,進行作戰技能訓練也很正常
也有不少駕駛員自己就是游擊與潛入作戰的高手的
不過人體本身的戰鬥能力是如何反應在機體戰鬥能力上面呢(._.?)
駕駛員是神射手能夠反應在機體的射擊/狙擊準確性這點還算說得通
可是日本人很愛玩「格鬥能力高強的人駕駛的機體近接戰能力也會提高」的梗
他們所指的還不是軍用近身格鬥術(C.Q.C.)而是實質意義上的「武功」
同樣都是標準駕駛艙,刀劍拳腳的功夫與機體動作有何相干?
更何況MS格鬥戰還有那麼多的動作是肉身根本辦不到的
習武鍛鍊出來的體魄與反應速度在駕駛MS作戰的時候也有用這點是無需否認
可是這跟武功老實說也沒有多大相干呢,又不是只有習武才能鍛鍊身體( ′-`)a
----
新機動戰記的五小強全部接受過特殊作戰訓練
其中應該只有張五飛有練過真的武術
可是他憑藉這身武術打的兩場重要戰鬥可是兩場都輸啊( ′-`)a
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.229.84.96
推
10/14 11:31, , 1F
10/14 11:31, 1F
→
10/14 11:36, , 2F
10/14 11:36, 2F
推
10/14 12:44, , 3F
10/14 12:44, 3F
推
10/14 13:33, , 4F
10/14 13:33, 4F
→
10/14 13:34, , 5F
10/14 13:34, 5F
推
10/14 13:57, , 6F
10/14 13:57, 6F
推
10/14 14:13, , 7F
10/14 14:13, 7F
推
10/14 14:37, , 8F
10/14 14:37, 8F
→
10/14 14:38, , 9F
10/14 14:38, 9F
→
10/14 14:39, , 10F
10/14 14:39, 10F
→
10/14 14:46, , 11F
10/14 14:46, 11F
→
10/14 14:48, , 12F
10/14 14:48, 12F
→
10/14 17:57, , 13F
10/14 17:57, 13F
推
10/14 18:14, , 14F
10/14 18:14, 14F
推
10/14 19:00, , 15F
10/14 19:00, 15F
推
10/14 19:55, , 16F
10/14 19:55, 16F
→
10/14 19:56, , 17F
10/14 19:56, 17F
推
10/14 22:56, , 18F
10/14 22:56, 18F
推
10/14 22:58, , 19F
10/14 22:58, 19F
→
10/14 22:58, , 20F
10/14 22:58, 20F
→
10/14 23:18, , 21F
10/14 23:18, 21F
→
10/14 23:19, , 22F
10/14 23:19, 22F
→
10/14 23:25, , 23F
10/14 23:25, 23F
推
10/14 23:28, , 24F
10/14 23:28, 24F
推
10/15 00:11, , 25F
10/15 00:11, 25F
→
10/15 00:12, , 26F
10/15 00:12, 26F
→
10/15 00:17, , 27F
10/15 00:17, 27F
→
10/15 00:19, , 28F
10/15 00:19, 28F
→
10/15 00:19, , 29F
10/15 00:19, 29F
推
10/15 00:23, , 30F
10/15 00:23, 30F
推
10/15 00:33, , 31F
10/15 00:33, 31F
→
10/15 00:34, , 32F
10/15 00:34, 32F
推
10/15 00:34, , 33F
10/15 00:34, 33F
→
10/15 00:34, , 34F
10/15 00:34, 34F
→
10/15 00:34, , 35F
10/15 00:34, 35F
→
10/15 00:35, , 36F
10/15 00:35, 36F
→
10/15 00:48, , 37F
10/15 00:48, 37F
→
10/15 00:49, , 38F
10/15 00:49, 38F
→
10/15 00:50, , 39F
10/15 00:50, 39F
→
10/15 00:51, , 40F
10/15 00:51, 40F
→
10/15 00:52, , 41F
10/15 00:52, 41F
→
10/15 00:55, , 42F
10/15 00:55, 42F
→
10/15 01:05, , 43F
10/15 01:05, 43F
→
10/15 01:35, , 44F
10/15 01:35, 44F
→
10/15 01:35, , 45F
10/15 01:35, 45F
→
10/15 01:36, , 46F
10/15 01:36, 46F
推
10/15 02:05, , 47F
10/15 02:05, 47F
推
10/15 02:07, , 48F
10/15 02:07, 48F
→
10/15 02:07, , 49F
10/15 02:07, 49F
→
10/15 18:05, , 50F
10/15 18:05, 50F
→
10/15 18:05, , 51F
10/15 18:05, 51F
推
10/16 00:29, , 52F
10/16 00:29, 52F
→
10/16 02:50, , 53F
10/16 02:50, 53F
→
10/16 02:51, , 54F
10/16 02:51, 54F
→
10/16 02:55, , 55F
10/16 02:55, 55F
→
10/16 02:56, , 56F
10/16 02:56, 56F
→
10/16 02:57, , 57F
10/16 02:57, 57F
→
10/16 02:59, , 58F
10/16 02:59, 58F
→
10/16 13:25, , 59F
10/16 13:25, 59F
→
10/16 13:25, , 60F
10/16 13:25, 60F
→
10/16 15:06, , 61F
10/16 15:06, 61F
→
10/16 15:17, , 62F
10/16 15:17, 62F
推
10/16 17:57, , 63F
10/16 17:57, 63F
→
10/16 17:58, , 64F
10/16 17:58, 64F
→
10/16 17:58, , 65F
10/16 17:58, 65F
→
10/17 00:58, , 66F
10/17 00:58, 66F
推
10/17 18:26, , 67F
10/17 18:26, 67F
→
10/17 21:55, , 68F
10/17 21:55, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):