Re: pp3-cr-96
※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言：
: In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently account for 6 percent of
: miles driven on Partoria’s roads but are involved in 12 percent of all
: highway fatalities. The very largest trucks—those with three trailers—had
: less than a third of the accident rate of single- and double-trailer trucks.
: Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to reduce highway deaths would be to
: require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.
: Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
: A. No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it
: will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.
: B. So far only the best, most experienced drivers for Partorian trucking
: companies have been driving triple-trailer trucks.
: C. Very few fatal collisions involving trucks in Partoria are collisions
: between two trucks.
: D. In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has
: improved slightly over the past ten years.
: E. In Partoria, the maximum legal payload of a triple-trailer truck is less
: than three times the maximum legal payload of the largest of the
: single-trailer trucks.
: 想請問正解 B
: 題目的因果: 增加triple-trailer trucks----highway deaths下降
: 其他選項我都可以排除
: 可是B是哪裡反駁
: 請大大幫忙一下
: 謝
剛在GMATCLUB.com做到這一題
我跟一些外國朋友一樣思考(B)選項時出了問題
我解讀(B)選項時跟他們一樣心裡想的是：
倘若只有最棒最具經驗的司機才能開三節大卡車
所以實施政策以後當然可以降低事故死亡率
因為這種車只有最優秀的菁英（經過嚴格的訓練考試實習篩選後）才能開
所以(B)反而是strengthen
結果真的大出我意料之外
到底我的思考邏輯出了什麼問題呢？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.227.39.63
推
09/19 14:25, , 1F
09/19 14:25, 1F
→
09/19 14:26, , 2F
09/19 14:26, 2F
→
09/19 14:26, , 3F
09/19 14:26, 3F
→
09/19 14:27, , 4F
09/19 14:27, 4F
→
09/19 14:27, , 5F
09/19 14:27, 5F
→
09/19 16:25, , 6F
09/19 16:25, 6F
→
09/19 16:25, , 7F
09/19 16:25, 7F
→
09/19 16:26, , 8F
09/19 16:26, 8F
→
09/19 16:28, , 9F
09/19 16:28, 9F
推
09/20 10:37, , 10F
09/20 10:37, 10F
→
09/20 10:38, , 11F
09/20 10:38, 11F
→
09/20 10:39, , 12F
09/20 10:39, 12F
→
09/20 10:40, , 13F
09/20 10:40, 13F
→
09/20 10:41, , 14F
09/20 10:41, 14F
→
09/21 21:31, , 15F
09/21 21:31, 15F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：