[CR. ] 請教版大

看板GMAT作者 (lifeandjob)時間11年前 (2012/09/24 22:09), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
剛剛看到看到這個題目 請問為什麼答案是E Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. During the half hour the advertisement was aired, a substantial portion of the viewing public tuned into the advertisement. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in watching lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A. The candidate's ratings improved significantly as a result of the half-hour-long political advertisement. B. Political advertisements have become increasingly influential in determining voters' decisions at the polls. C. Many people would appreciate the opportunity to become better acquainted with political candidates' views on current political issues. D. Most people who are interested in political issues watch television regularly. E. Most of the viewers who tuned in to the candidate's half-hour-long advertisement last year did not change channels after the first few minutes. http://www.facebook.com/gmat.beat -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.245.65.132 ※ 編輯: lifeandjob 來自: 60.245.65.132 (09/24 22:10) ※ 編輯: lifeandjob 來自: 60.245.65.132 (09/24 22:12) ※ 編輯: lifeandjob 來自: 60.245.65.132 (09/24 22:13)

09/25 05:35, , 1F
其他看起來都無關 我覺得E 你把not拿掉
09/25 05:35, 1F

09/25 05:36, , 2F
1. 有些人轉台到那台看這個很長的廣告---
09/25 05:36, 2F

09/25 05:36, , 3F
2.結論: 大家比以前愛看常的政治廣告
09/25 05:36, 3F

09/25 05:37, , 4F
E not 拿掉以後 是說很多人轉台幾分鐘以後就轉台了
09/25 05:37, 4F

09/25 05:37, , 5F
就是說大家有轉台 可是一下就轉台 代表他們還是沒興趣
09/25 05:37, 5F

09/25 05:37, , 6F
是反駁 所以放回去就是假設了 不知道這樣解釋可以嗎
09/25 05:37, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1GO6cdIu (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #1GO6cdIu (GMAT)