[問題] PP1-CR-8

看板GMAT作者 (天天保持好心情)時間12年前 (2012/07/17 00:13), 編輯推噓1(107)
留言8則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
Automobile Dealer's Advertisement: The Highway Traffic Safety Institute reports that the PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class. This shows that the PZ 1000 is one of the safest cars available today. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement? (A) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute report listed many cars in other classes that had more injuries per accident than did the PZ 1000. (B) In recent years many more PZ 1000s have been sold than have any other kind of car in its class. (C) Cars in the class to which the PZ 1000 belongs are more likely to be involved in accidents than are other types of cars. (D) The difference between the number of injuries per accident for the PZ 1000 and that for other cars in its class is quite pronounced. (E) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute issues reports only once a year. 請問 這題 我列出來的因果是 the fewest injuries per accident ----> one of the safest cars ABDE 我都知道攻擊點在哪 但是整解C 題目不是已經說 PZ1000 has the fewest injuries 可是C又說 more likely to be involved in accidents 這樣不就矛盾了 是哪邊想錯了嗎 麻煩一下 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.85.208.77

07/17 01:00, , 1F
它說因為「PZ1000發生車禍時統計出來的受傷數較少」
07/17 01:00, 1F

07/17 01:02, , 2F
所以「PZ1000是最安全的車」。接著題目要你weaken的
07/17 01:02, 2F

07/17 01:03, , 3F
的是「PZ1000是最安全的車」這點,所以
07/17 01:03, 3F

07/17 01:04, , 4F
(C)PZ1000是發生意外率最高的車。
07/17 01:04, 4F

07/17 01:05, , 5F
所以就算統計出來坐這台車可能車禍不容易受傷但這牌
07/17 01:05, 5F

07/17 01:06, , 6F
但這牌的車子卻容易發生車禍->所以不能說它是台安全
07/17 01:06, 6F

07/17 01:07, , 7F
的車子,故weaken
07/17 01:07, 7F

07/23 00:12, , 8F
TKS
07/23 00:12, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1G13sH6s (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
問題
0
1
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
問題
1
8
問題
0
1
文章代碼(AID): #1G13sH6s (GMAT)