OG12-CR-112
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been
significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped
all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of
televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent
statistics show a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia.
Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of
televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A)The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least
as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
(B)Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions
assembled in Borodia do not have.
(C)The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to
assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three
years.
(D)The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased
significantly during the past three years.
(E)The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in
Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to
decrease in the next few years.
想請問這一題 想的頭好暈阿@@"
題目最後說 因為 在B地的 T.V assemblers 人數減少---> B地進口電視增加
題目前面又說 在B地的電視數量不變
所以 B的總電視數量(不變)=B自己生產的(勢必要減少)+進口的(節論說增加)
(A) 無關比較
(B) 這要怎麼說他錯阿?
(C) 取非, B地的工人效率減少,怎麼感覺是支持結論阿???
(D) 取非,在V過去3年,電視數量沒有增加,既然沒有增加 那好像反駁結論???
(E) 薪資縮小,但還是跟題目一開始說的一樣 B>>V
請問BCD該怎麼想 大腦都打結了
感謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.85.112.172
推
04/17 16:19, , 1F
04/17 16:19, 1F
→
04/17 16:20, , 2F
04/17 16:20, 2F
→
04/17 16:21, , 3F
04/17 16:21, 3F
→
04/17 18:18, , 4F
04/17 18:18, 4F
→
04/17 18:19, , 5F
04/17 18:19, 5F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先)：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇)：