Re: [問題] 請問svo, ving 問題
※ 引述《laughters (ptt不等於世界)》之銘言：
: S V O, ving. 後面的ving 我目前所認知是解釋上句(因)的結果
: 但是做pp3解釋版 裡面有說後面的ving 有時會錯誤的修飾到前面的O
: 所以請各版幫我解釋解釋
: 感謝大家
句尾Ving結構下除了including外基本上都是做副詞片語用，所以錯誤修飾前面O的概念是
做形容詞片語，在句尾Ving結構下不會這樣看。
我把OG官方版解釋彙總一下，讓大家有個標準可做參考:
1. OG-10, Q256.
"To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters,
being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius."
OG 解釋:
"the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies
the subject of the preceding clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew
of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts."
That is "ing" verb form modifies subject of preceding clause.
======================================
2. Q43 of OG-11, 也出現在OG12版題目
"Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer,
bringing to 34 the number of wild"
OG 解釋:
"Bringing is the present participle of the verb to bring. As used here,
it correctly describes an action that happens at the same time as the action
in the main clause; bringing indicates that the number of wild birds became
34 when the five eagles left their nests."
That is "ing" verb form modifies the action of the preceding clause.
======================================
3. Q15 of OG-11, "The Iroquois were primarily planters, but supplementing their
cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting."
OG 解釋:
"The participle supplementing would normally be expected to modify the first
clause, describing or extending its meaning, but the logic of this sentence
demands a contrast, not an extension"
That is "ing" verb form modifies the entire previous clause.
======================================
4. OG12-DT45
In 1923, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women
and children in the District of Columbia, ruling that it was a form of
pricefixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.
OG 解釋:
The Supreme Court is the subject of the sentence; declared is the verb. Ruling
…contract acts a modifier describing the action of the main clause; because
the modifier is subordinate to the main clause, the conjunction and must be
omitted. And is used to join two independent clauses, not a clause and its
modifier.
歸納一下，基本上句尾Ving是做adv.phrase，有兩種功能，第一種是修飾前句動作做進
一步的延伸解釋，另外一種是對前句的動作表達因果關係，但是有沒有發現OG都沒有說到
做形容詞片語修飾受詞，都是說做副詞片語修飾動詞，若這個研究有問題歡迎進一步討論
。
--
A兔GMAT作戰中心
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.121.237.129
推
10/06 22:20, , 1F
10/06 22:20, 1F
推
10/06 22:30, , 2F
10/06 22:30, 2F
→
10/06 22:31, , 3F
10/06 22:31, 3F
→
10/06 22:32, , 4F
10/06 22:32, 4F
推
10/07 10:13, , 5F
10/07 10:13, 5F
→
10/07 10:15, , 6F
10/07 10:15, 6F
推
10/07 10:17, , 7F
10/07 10:17, 7F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：