Re: [問題] Manhattan CR

看板GMAT作者 (想閉關可是門關不起來)時間14年前 (2009/11/28 21:28), 編輯推噓1(101)
留言2則, 1人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
一點愚見 紅色是說, 以前某個proposal的結果是失敗的 藍色是作者自己的proposal 綠色和之後的部份用來支持作者的proposal用的 所以A, C, D就可以不要選 E: 紅色好像是個小結論, 不過作者是要反駁它而不是為其背書. B: 第一, "an alternative to analyst's proposal" 講那麼多其實就是指 政府的proposal. 沒錯, 紅色就是說政府的proposal沒用 第二, 就是綠色用來支持作者的proposal的兩個理由之一 ※ 引述《musiclife729 (愛情是緣是命是孤獨)》之銘言: : 標題: [問題] Manhattan CR : 時間: Sat Nov 28 20:35:14 2009 : Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase. : : The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above? : : : A.The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second : is a premise that supports the the first. : : B.The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the : analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the : analyst's main claim. : : C.The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by : the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument. : : D.The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is : that proposal. : : E.The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second : is a premise that opposes that conclusion. : : : : : : : ans:B : : 不懂他哪裡undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal : 能理解他undermines 政府的proposal... : 還是我哪裡沒看懂@@ : 有哪位大大能幫我解答一下嗎QQ 感恩 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.136.98.119 ※ 編輯: micron 來自: 220.136.98.119 (11/28 21:29)

11/29 09:03, , 1F
感謝...
11/29 09:03, 1F

11/29 09:04, , 2F
所以alternative to the analyst's proposal要怎翻呢
11/29 09:04, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1B4ILw8t (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1B4ILw8t (GMAT)