Re: [語文] 請問修辭的"比較"省略題型

看板GMAT作者 (人品)時間14年前 (2009/11/03 23:15), 編輯推噓2(2013)
留言15則, 5人參與, 5年前最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《teeed (這是綽號)》之銘言: : 下面是3題關於"比較"的題型, : 其中似乎都有省略? 為何可以這樣省略呢? (還是為了要對稱?) : 可否請板上高手指點? 謝謝大家!! : GWD9-Q16 : Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the : presidential campaign of 1992, (a great proportion than it was) in any : previous election. : A. a greater proportion than it was : B. a greater proportion than : C. a greater proportion than they have been : D. which is greater than was so : E. which is greater than it has been : * 答案: B which 讓DE不用看 至於為何B 我的理解是因為"in any previous ..." 的 any 讓 A C的it, they 不適合 翻成中文 "比 它/他們 在任何選舉中" 沒有比 "比在任何選舉中"來的好 : GWD11-Q30 : According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first : state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty (than) : under it. : A. than : B. than born : C. than they were : D. than there had been : E. than had been born : * 答案: A 就是相對簡潔的感覺 因為比較的是生母的不同年齡 over the age of thirty vs. under it(thirty) B than born -> born under thrity? C than they were -> 好像可以說they是指代women 但結構跟前面也不平行 : PP2-Q7 : So-called green taxes, which exact a price for the use of polluting or : nonrenewable fuels, are having a positive effect on the environment and : natural resource base of countries (as varied as) China, the Netherlands, : and Hungary. : A. as varied as : B. as varied as are : C. as varied as those of : D. that are as varied as : E. that are varied as are : * 答案: A 這題比的是不同國家 前面的 a positive effet on ....base of 是各個國家的這些東西 也就是在各個國家中都是一樣的 所以A相對簡潔 若C those of -> those指甚麼? 前面一大串 各國的環境與自然資源會不一樣 但green taxes都會對env. and natural res. 產生正面效果 -> 一樣的a positive effect on.... 就不用重複也可理解 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 58.114.211.34

11/03 23:16, , 1F
啊我不是高手啦,講得不好還請高手指點
11/03 23:16, 1F

11/04 16:09, , 2F
1.直接看than後面,it was/they have been/was so指代什麼?
11/04 16:09, 2F

11/04 16:10, , 3F
顯然跟 a greater proportion 比不合理. 全刪只剩下 B.
11/04 16:10, 3F

11/04 16:10, , 4F
這一題 OG12 好像有.
11/04 16:10, 4F

11/04 19:50, , 5F
謝謝兩位大大!!再請問第1題it為什麼不能代"the spending"呢?
11/04 19:50, 5F

11/04 22:21, , 6F
我覺得可以 只是it是明確指代 所以會變成
11/04 22:21, 6F

11/04 22:21, , 7F
the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992
11/04 22:21, 7F

11/04 22:22, , 8F
was in any previous election
11/04 22:22, 8F

11/04 22:22, , 9F
不知這樣有沒有錯...
11/04 22:22, 9F

11/05 12:54, , 10F
第一題問題點:"it was/they have". half the spending後面無
11/05 12:54, 10F

11/05 12:54, , 11F
動詞,那was/have指代什麼? 光是有動詞的選項就刪光光.
11/05 12:54, 11F

11/05 12:56, , 12F
最後只剩下B. 即使這五個選項有 than the spending/it,簡潔原
11/05 12:56, 12F

11/05 12:56, , 13F
則(or Redundancy)觀點,也是沒 B好.
11/05 12:56, 13F

11/05 12:58, , 14F
說錯, than後面要是 proportion性質的名詞.
11/05 12:58, 14F

12/02 18:43, 5年前 , 15F
"it was/the https://noxiv.com
12/02 18:43, 15F
文章代碼(AID): #1Ay4alGB (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #1Ay4alGB (GMAT)