Re: [語文] 請問修辭的"比較"省略題型
※ 引述《teeed (這是綽號)》之銘言:
: 下面是3題關於"比較"的題型,
: 其中似乎都有省略? 為何可以這樣省略呢? (還是為了要對稱?)
: 可否請板上高手指點? 謝謝大家!!
: GWD9-Q16
: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the
: presidential campaign of 1992, (a great proportion than it was) in any
: previous election.
: A. a greater proportion than it was
: B. a greater proportion than
: C. a greater proportion than they have been
: D. which is greater than was so
: E. which is greater than it has been
: * 答案: B
which 讓DE不用看
至於為何B
我的理解是因為"in any previous ..." 的 any 讓 A C的it, they 不適合
翻成中文 "比 它/他們 在任何選舉中" 沒有比 "比在任何選舉中"來的好
: GWD11-Q30
: According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first
: state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty (than)
: under it.
: A. than
: B. than born
: C. than they were
: D. than there had been
: E. than had been born
: * 答案: A
就是相對簡潔的感覺
因為比較的是生母的不同年齡 over the age of thirty vs. under it(thirty)
B than born -> born under thrity?
C than they were -> 好像可以說they是指代women
但結構跟前面也不平行
: PP2-Q7
: So-called green taxes, which exact a price for the use of polluting or
: nonrenewable fuels, are having a positive effect on the environment and
: natural resource base of countries (as varied as) China, the Netherlands,
: and Hungary.
: A. as varied as
: B. as varied as are
: C. as varied as those of
: D. that are as varied as
: E. that are varied as are
: * 答案: A
這題比的是不同國家
前面的 a positive effet on ....base of 是各個國家的這些東西
也就是在各個國家中都是一樣的 所以A相對簡潔
若C those of -> those指甚麼? 前面一大串 各國的環境與自然資源會不一樣
但green taxes都會對env. and natural res. 產生正面效果
-> 一樣的a positive effect on....
就不用重複也可理解
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.211.34
→
11/03 23:16, , 1F
11/03 23:16, 1F
→
11/04 16:09, , 2F
11/04 16:09, 2F
→
11/04 16:10, , 3F
11/04 16:10, 3F
→
11/04 16:10, , 4F
11/04 16:10, 4F
推
11/04 19:50, , 5F
11/04 19:50, 5F
推
11/04 22:21, , 6F
11/04 22:21, 6F
→
11/04 22:21, , 7F
11/04 22:21, 7F
→
11/04 22:22, , 8F
11/04 22:22, 8F
→
11/04 22:22, , 9F
11/04 22:22, 9F
→
11/05 12:54, , 10F
11/05 12:54, 10F
→
11/05 12:54, , 11F
11/05 12:54, 11F
→
11/05 12:56, , 12F
11/05 12:56, 12F
→
11/05 12:56, , 13F
11/05 12:56, 13F
→
11/05 12:58, , 14F
11/05 12:58, 14F
→
12/02 18:43,
5年前
, 15F
12/02 18:43, 15F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):