[語文] pp1-150
150。 The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival
company for $950 million, which is part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the office
color-printing market.
(A) million, which is part of a deal that will make
(B) million, a part of a deal that makes
(C) million, part of a deal making
(D) million as a part of a deal to make
(E) million as part of a deal that will make
答案是E
PP中的解釋我有點疑問
(B) part of 表示是同位語，但deal 與million 不是同類，million 是個數位
number，它的同位語可以是a number…。deal 是business agreement，
用它作同位語的可以是agreement， contract 等；makes一般現
在時態錯誤，應該用將來時，表示將來的預期。
(C) part of 表示同位語，但deal 與million 不是同類，理由與選項B 相同；
分詞的形式不能表達出子句才具有
B,C 都被解釋成因為deal和million不同類所以同位語表意錯
但同位語原本就可用一個概括性的名詞來同位前面整個句子的意思,
並不一定只能同位最接近的一個名詞
所以B,C真的比E來的不好只在時態上沒表達未來的時間點
這樣的理解正確嗎？
--
Que Pasa
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.249.13
推
10/29 01:57, , 1F
10/29 01:57, 1F
→
10/29 01:57, , 2F
10/29 01:57, 2F
推
10/29 10:26, , 3F
10/29 10:26, 3F
→
10/29 10:26, , 4F
10/29 10:26, 4F
→
10/29 10:27, , 5F
10/29 10:27, 5F
→
10/29 10:28, , 6F
10/29 10:28, 6F
→
10/29 10:28, , 7F
10/29 10:28, 7F
→
10/29 20:41, , 8F
10/29 20:41, 8F
→
10/29 20:41, , 9F
10/29 20:41, 9F
推
10/30 09:40, , 10F
10/30 09:40, 10F
→
10/30 09:40, , 11F
10/30 09:40, 11F
→
10/30 09:41, , 12F
10/30 09:41, 12F
→
10/30 09:41, , 13F
10/30 09:41, 13F
→
10/30 09:41, , 14F
10/30 09:41, 14F
推
10/30 15:21, , 15F
10/30 15:21, 15F
推
10/31 12:36, , 16F
10/31 12:36, 16F
→
12/02 18:43,
7年前
, 17F
12/02 18:43, 17F