[語文] pp2-sc-215 (新)

看板GMAT作者 (han)時間15年前 (2009/07/19 13:15), 編輯推噓4(408)
留言12則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
215. Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-mile-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth. A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus C. have been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus are D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus E. have been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus are 答案是E 我選了C 因為印象中dated at + n. ex: dated at 1000 BC dated to be + adj. ex: dated to be 1000 years old 檢討的時候對照了CD上面下載的SC考點總結(955精華版)上面也是這樣寫的 請問正確的用法究竟是哪一個呢 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.245.107.103

07/19 15:20, , 1F

07/19 15:20, , 2F
剛好也用到"dated at"但每個選項都是接XXX years old
07/19 15:20, 2F

07/19 15:20, , 3F
同時google "dated at"也能找到很多文章(eg: amazon river
07/19 15:20, 3F

07/19 15:21, , 4F
dated at 11 million years old" 看來idiom "dated at"
07/19 15:21, 4F

07/19 15:21, , 5F
後面是可以接 years old的... 不然第一個連結的選項就都錯了
07/19 15:21, 5F

07/19 15:26, , 6F
如果兩者用法都正確 請選擇較簡潔的~因此at +N比to be+N好
07/19 15:26, 6F

07/19 15:29, , 7F
AT有時候答案文法都對的時候要選擇簡潔的@@~
07/19 15:29, 7F

07/19 16:04, , 8F
嗯嗯 我也是google之後發現有at+years old的用法
07/19 16:04, 8F

07/19 16:05, , 9F
但又覺得很奇怪 因為一般介詞後面不是要接名詞嗎...
07/19 16:05, 9F

07/19 16:07, , 10F
at + years "old" 卻是形容詞 讓我很疑惑 >"<
07/19 16:07, 10F

07/19 16:40, , 11F
可能只是慣用語法吧? XD 這種東西只能憑fu了 (拍拍)
07/19 16:40, 11F

07/20 23:42, , 12F
at ,to都可以,是錯在那個be. (be在此無任何作用)
07/20 23:42, 12F
文章代碼(AID): #1AOglVqi (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1AOglVqi (GMAT)