Re: [問題] PP1-CR10

看板GMAT作者 (逆趨勢者套)時間15年前 (2009/07/10 10:58), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《lovekyoko (匹茲堡的天空)》之銘言: : ennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer : video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due : almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only : video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also : sold them cheaply. : Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline : was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in : 1994. : Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the : objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation? : (A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold. : (B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in : Centerville. : (C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount : on certain nights of the week. : (D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a : theater. : (E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends : 答案E : 可是我覺得D好像也沒有錯 : 因為之前在電影院看過了 所以就沒去買或租片子 造成outlet下滑 : 這樣想有錯嗎 : 還是說E的答案更好 : 謝 如果你那樣想你就中計了 因為要反駁的是Brad的說法 , which is "不是Videorama賣了4000支的錯" 反駁之 --> "就是它賣了4000支的錯" --> (E) (D)支持或解釋Ennifer的說法 , which is "是Videorama賣了4000支的錯" -- buda buda buda buda buda buda buda buda -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.203.6

07/10 11:29, , 1F
謝謝 簽名檔是在幫自己打廣告嗎?XDDD
07/10 11:29, 1F
※ 編輯: buda 來自: 118.169.198.128 (07/10 14:17)
文章代碼(AID): #1ALgvoIx (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
問題
1
1
文章代碼(AID): #1ALgvoIx (GMAT)