Re: [語文] (cr) pp1-40
※ 引述《PINKENVI (是一條不歸路)》之銘言：
: 40. (32869-!-item-!-188;#058&006461)
: Columnist: People should avoid using a certain artificial fat that has been
: touted as a resource for those whose medical advisers have advised them to
: reduce their fat intake. Although the artificial fat, which can be used in
: place of fat in food preparation, has none of the negative health effects of
: fat, it does have a serious drawback: it absorbs certain essential vitamins,
: thereby preventing them from being used by the body.
人工奶油對人體雖無副作用，但會吸收維他命使人體無法使用（維他命），
所以應該避免使用。
從題幹看，選項應該要針對這個因果關係做 evaluation。
: In evaluating the columnist's position, it would be most useful to determine
: which of the following?
: (A) Whether increasing one's intake of the vitamins can compensate for
: the effects of the artificial fat
(A) 正確。
YES => weaken 原論點，因為有替代方案。
NO => support 原論點。
(B)~(E) 的問題度不論答案為何都不影響原論點。
(B) Irrelevant。含脂食物不在討論範圍內。
(C) Irrelevant。低脂餐延長時間是否有危險不在討論範圍內。
(D) Irrelevant。餐點是否可準備不在討論範圍內。
(E) Irrelevant。口感如何不在討論範圍內。
: (B) Whether the vitamins that the artificial fat absorbs are present in foods
: that contain the fat
: (C) Whether having an extremely low fat intake for an extended period can
: endanger the health
: (D) Whether there are any foods that cannot be prepared using the artificial
: fat as a substitute for other fats
: (E) Whether people are generally able to detect differences in taste between
: foods prepared using the artificial fat and foods that are similar except
: for the use of other fats
: Ans: A
: 想請教一下這題關於evaluate的問題!
: 謝謝!!
--
Jeany's Talk: The Skyline.
電影。書。建築。旅行。以及生活。
我以我的角度、仰望大千世界的天際線。
My Blog: http://jeanytalk.blogspot.com
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 68.181.237.20
推
08/13 19:46, , 1F
08/13 19:46, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：