Re: [語文] FeiFei-82
我的想法是這樣:
題目是在問這個結論的前提假設是啥 不是在問結論本身
所以你只能就題目給的結論去找出跟這結論有相關的東西 其餘不相干的就不要弄進來
D提到的內容(可以把照片當做corroborative evidence等等)是多餘的 因為在題目的結論
中 根本沒提到這點 既然都沒扯到關於額外的證據等等資訊 為何假設會有?
題目的結論只說到 照片的sense都會有錯誤 所以nothing can ever be definitively
proved with a photograph.
所以你只能就五個答案中 找出與這結論完全有關的選項
不要去做其他過度的推論 也不要誤把假設, 前提等 當做結論來選
如此 就知道A這選項是最正確的了
※ 引述《PINKENVI (是一條不歸路)》之銘言：
: 82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits
: hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could
: always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot
: express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing
: can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.
: Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion
: above to be properly drawn?
: A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth
: cannot furnish definitive proof.
: B. The whole truth cannot be known.
: C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph
: in any sense.
: D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence
: if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene
: photographed.
: E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove
: definitively the truth about it
: 恩。我現在在(A)和(D)之間掙扎。
: 答案是(A)
: 這是assumption，大部分這類問題都是要取非。但是，如果D要從哪裡取非?
: 那又要如何反駁題目?題目也是要取非嗎?
: 我不太懂。請各位幫忙一下這類ASSUMPTION問題。
: 謝謝!
--
No doubt, just keep walking
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.74.96
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：