Re: [分享] 戰神說他收到對面的邀請
我覺得這真的有點棘手
不知道對方到底是不是鴻門宴就單刀赴會
不去的話 又好像會被大作文章說不願跟中國溝通
要去的話 又很容易被分化
舉個例子:
對岸學者: 請問你們推的監督條例 列明是中華民國與中華人民共和國
所以你們是支持台獨嗎 ?
我們當然可以很瀟灑的說 對我們心裡上覺得我們是兩個國家
但是在那個狀況要怎麼說呢 ?
說是嗎 ? 那我們支持反黑箱服貿的群眾就先分裂了 新聞馬上分化
(因為大家的共識是反程序性的問題 裡面並非所有人都支持獨立)
那美國那邊會怎麼看待群眾 ? 美國基本上是反對台灣公開宣稱獨立的
不然阿扁就不會那麼慘了 到最後還直接說台獨做不到就是做不到
說不是嗎 ? 那我們不就是承認兩岸是同一個國家,這樣支持群眾還是會分裂
新聞馬上說民眾推的監督條例是錯的 當場直接鳥掉
這還只是我們隨便想都知道對方一定問的問題,所以真的是很兩難的抉擇。
我不確定是否單純發聲明稿回應或直接上戰場讓中國學者理解我們的立場
哪邊比較好
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 112.105.197.139
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1397403781.A.179.html
→
04/13 23:44, , 1F
04/13 23:44, 1F
推
04/13 23:44, , 2F
04/13 23:44, 2F
推
04/13 23:44, , 3F
04/13 23:44, 3F
→
04/13 23:45, , 4F
04/13 23:45, 4F
推
04/13 23:46, , 5F
04/13 23:46, 5F
→
04/13 23:46, , 6F
04/13 23:46, 6F
如果是這樣 那就只有直接去的選擇
去有去的好處 如果對方的學者都還是理性的
黃老師的論述性夠強 應該還是能間接幫助北京領導中心了解我們的想法
畢竟中國的影響力如此巨大 也不可能關起門來都不理對岸想法的
這太不切實際
但是針對可能性問題還是要先跑過 有些敏感性或陷阱問題
還是只能實問虛答吧 但這種狀況 黃老師應該比我們還豐富了
※ 編輯: centra (112.105.197.139), 04/13/2014 23:51:45
→
04/13 23:47, , 7F
04/13 23:47, 7F
→
04/13 23:48, , 8F
04/13 23:48, 8F
→
04/13 23:48, , 9F
04/13 23:48, 9F
→
04/13 23:49, , 10F
04/13 23:49, 10F
推
04/13 23:49, , 11F
04/13 23:49, 11F
→
04/13 23:49, , 12F
04/13 23:49, 12F
→
04/13 23:50, , 13F
04/13 23:50, 13F
→
04/13 23:50, , 14F
04/13 23:50, 14F
→
04/13 23:50, , 15F
04/13 23:50, 15F
→
04/13 23:50, , 16F
04/13 23:50, 16F
推
04/13 23:51, , 17F
04/13 23:51, 17F
→
04/13 23:51, , 18F
04/13 23:51, 18F
→
04/13 23:51, , 19F
04/13 23:51, 19F
→
04/13 23:52, , 20F
04/13 23:52, 20F
→
04/13 23:52, , 21F
04/13 23:52, 21F
→
04/13 23:53, , 22F
04/13 23:53, 22F
→
04/13 23:54, , 23F
04/13 23:54, 23F
如果是密室
或開放台灣媒體(但僅限於友好媒體) 這就比較麻煩
因為寫出來的偏頗新聞絕對是黃老師又要一直出來澄清的
所以我才說這實在是很兩難
※ 編輯: centra (112.105.197.139), 04/13/2014 23:56:59
→
04/13 23:55, , 24F
04/13 23:55, 24F
推
04/13 23:56, , 25F
04/13 23:56, 25F
→
04/13 23:57, , 26F
04/13 23:57, 26F
→
04/13 23:58, , 27F
04/13 23:58, 27F
→
04/13 23:59, , 28F
04/13 23:59, 28F
→
04/13 23:59, , 29F
04/13 23:59, 29F
→
04/14 00:00, , 30F
04/14 00:00, 30F
→
04/14 00:01, , 31F
04/14 00:01, 31F
→
04/14 00:02, , 32F
04/14 00:02, 32F
→
04/14 00:02, , 33F
04/14 00:02, 33F
→
04/14 00:02, , 34F
04/14 00:02, 34F
→
04/14 00:03, , 35F
04/14 00:03, 35F
→
04/14 00:03, , 36F
04/14 00:03, 36F
→
04/14 00:03, , 37F
04/14 00:03, 37F
→
04/14 00:04, , 38F
04/14 00:04, 38F
→
04/14 00:04, , 39F
04/14 00:04, 39F
→
04/14 00:04, , 40F
04/14 00:04, 40F
→
04/14 00:04, , 41F
04/14 00:04, 41F
→
04/14 00:05, , 42F
04/14 00:05, 42F
→
04/14 00:06, , 43F
04/14 00:06, 43F
→
04/14 00:06, , 44F
04/14 00:06, 44F
→
04/14 00:06, , 45F
04/14 00:06, 45F
→
04/14 00:07, , 46F
04/14 00:07, 46F
→
04/14 00:08, , 47F
04/14 00:08, 47F
→
04/14 00:10, , 48F
04/14 00:10, 48F
→
04/14 00:10, , 49F
04/14 00:10, 49F
→
04/14 00:12, , 50F
04/14 00:12, 50F
→
04/14 00:12, , 51F
04/14 00:12, 51F
→
04/14 00:12, , 52F
04/14 00:12, 52F
→
04/14 00:13, , 53F
04/14 00:13, 53F
→
04/14 00:13, , 54F
04/14 00:13, 54F
→
04/14 00:14, , 55F
04/14 00:14, 55F
→
04/14 00:15, , 56F
04/14 00:15, 56F
→
04/14 00:15, , 57F
04/14 00:15, 57F
→
04/14 00:15, , 58F
04/14 00:15, 58F
→
04/14 00:16, , 59F
04/14 00:16, 59F
→
04/14 00:16, , 60F
04/14 00:16, 60F
→
04/14 00:17, , 61F
04/14 00:17, 61F
→
04/14 00:19, , 62F
04/14 00:19, 62F
→
04/14 00:20, , 63F
04/14 00:20, 63F
→
04/14 00:23, , 64F
04/14 00:23, 64F
→
04/14 00:24, , 65F
04/14 00:24, 65F
→
04/14 00:25, , 66F
04/14 00:25, 66F
→
04/14 00:25, , 67F
04/14 00:25, 67F
→
04/14 00:26, , 68F
04/14 00:26, 68F
→
04/14 00:27, , 69F
04/14 00:27, 69F
→
04/14 00:28, , 70F
04/14 00:28, 70F
→
04/14 00:29, , 71F
04/14 00:29, 71F
→
04/14 00:29, , 72F
04/14 00:29, 72F
→
04/14 00:30, , 73F
04/14 00:30, 73F
→
04/14 00:30, , 74F
04/14 00:30, 74F
→
04/14 00:31, , 75F
04/14 00:31, 75F
推
04/14 01:18, , 76F
04/14 01:18, 76F
推
04/14 01:20, , 77F
04/14 01:20, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)