[閒聊] 反服貿實在危言聳聽阿
反服貿的幾個理由
1.開放電信是清兵入山海關
實際:開放3項第二類特殊業務是封閉性網路
2.衝擊就業與勞工
實際:不開放大陸勞工
3.中國挾帶大量資金控制台灣金融
實際:陸資最多只能持有台灣上市業者10%股份
福懋的問題在哪裡?
我還真看不出來...
反黑箱
但是不反服貿 才是王道!!
你們的邏輯真的很妙,就算10%能控制公司
但就等於能控制過半的市場與產業嗎?
這什麼神邏輯囧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.242.98.167
推
04/03 11:38, , 1F
04/03 11:38, 1F
→
04/03 11:38, , 2F
04/03 11:38, 2F
推
04/03 11:38, , 3F
04/03 11:38, 3F
→
04/03 11:38, , 4F
04/03 11:38, 4F
噓
04/03 11:39, , 5F
04/03 11:39, 5F
→
04/03 11:39, , 6F
04/03 11:39, 6F
→
04/03 11:39, , 7F
04/03 11:39, 7F
→
04/03 11:39, , 8F
04/03 11:39, 8F
→
04/03 11:39, , 9F
04/03 11:39, 9F
→
04/03 11:39, , 10F
04/03 11:39, 10F
推
04/03 11:39, , 11F
04/03 11:39, 11F
噓
04/03 11:39, , 12F
04/03 11:39, 12F
→
04/03 11:40, , 13F
04/03 11:40, 13F
噓
04/03 11:40, , 14F
04/03 11:40, 14F
噓
04/03 11:40, , 15F
04/03 11:40, 15F
噓
04/03 11:40, , 16F
04/03 11:40, 16F
→
04/03 11:41, , 17F
04/03 11:41, 17F
噓
04/03 11:41, , 18F
04/03 11:41, 18F
→
04/03 11:41, , 19F
04/03 11:41, 19F
噓
04/03 11:41, , 20F
04/03 11:41, 20F
→
04/03 11:41, , 21F
04/03 11:41, 21F
噓
04/03 11:41, , 22F
04/03 11:41, 22F
→
04/03 11:41, , 23F
04/03 11:41, 23F
噓
04/03 11:41, , 24F
04/03 11:41, 24F
→
04/03 11:42, , 25F
04/03 11:42, 25F
噓
04/03 11:42, , 26F
04/03 11:42, 26F
→
04/03 11:42, , 27F
04/03 11:42, 27F
噓
04/03 11:44, , 28F
04/03 11:44, 28F
噓
04/03 11:44, , 29F
04/03 11:44, 29F
噓
04/03 11:52, , 30F
04/03 11:52, 30F
推
04/03 11:59, , 31F
04/03 11:59, 31F
→
04/03 12:01, , 32F
04/03 12:01, 32F
→
04/03 12:02, , 33F
04/03 12:02, 33F
推
04/03 12:21, , 34F
04/03 12:21, 34F
噓
04/03 12:21, , 35F
04/03 12:21, 35F
→
04/03 12:22, , 36F
04/03 12:22, 36F
這點不成立吧 陸商也會來台
噓
04/03 12:24, , 37F
04/03 12:24, 37F
※ 編輯: takuminauki (111.242.98.167), 04/03/2014 12:47:18
討論串 (同標題文章)