[心得] 白色社會正義聯盟為何反反服貿?
我看了白色社會正義聯盟的主張明明跟林飛帆他們都一樣,
很困惑為何他們要反學運?
他們FB上的簡介是:
人們得到了自由民主 卻無法自制自己的私心
藉機的利用了自由民主之名
表現自己的人格劣根性
我的解讀:馬英九總統自從當選後,已用黨紀強暴了無數次民意。
(不要再告訴我689是民意,相同的話我講到跳針。
689選馬英九做事,然後全民選出所有的立委「監督」馬英九,
現在立法委員被馬英九用黨鞭打臉打到都腫了,
誰來告訴我這民意怎麼算
核四案跑票罰款、倒閣案跑票開除黨籍、地政士法跑票停權一年,
因為要用接下來的提名權恫嚇立委對服貿投票。
最近林飛帆提出的兩岸監督條例同意書,
為了年底的選票,藍委也超想簽呀。
但是簽了連提名都沒辦法了,管什麼選票。
這還不算「利用民主自由之名,表現自己人格的劣根性」嗎?)
當這社會已漸漸失去秩序與良知 理性與和平也不再
我的解讀:當總統用這樣的方式強暴民意,多數人只是隔岸觀火鬥。
明明選出立委,也不盡公民義務。
制止總統管太寬,讓立委瘋狂被打臉。「失去秩序與良知」
我們 社會中極少數 還保持著一絲絲正義良知 理性理念的人
就必須勇敢再站出來 表達自己的理念
發揮一絲能夠影響社會的力量
我的解讀:保有正義良知,
就要解決現在總統違反權力分立的憲政精神的問題,
少數保持正義良知,了解民主失衡的你我要站出來行動。
(完全符合林飛帆他們的訴求:
請總統馬英九承諾不要再以黨紀箝制代議士)
---------------------
基於以上觀點,我不明白這個聯盟為何反反服貿運動
因為所謂反服貿運動,他並不是不要「服貿」,
而是要審慎評估,有審查制度,監督制度
你可以支持服貿,但為了自己的立場,
無視馬英九總統箝制代議士,讓服貿必然通過,「違法」不論。
手持民主大旗,說其他人都不代表民意。
說自己是「理性」、「和平」、「沒私心」?
我覺得有自己打臉的嫌疑。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.177.224.72
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1396054111.A.AB2.html
推
03/29 08:50, , 1F
03/29 08:50, 1F
→
03/29 08:51, , 2F
03/29 08:51, 2F
噓
03/29 08:51, , 3F
03/29 08:51, 3F
→
03/29 08:51, , 4F
03/29 08:51, 4F
推
03/29 08:51, , 5F
03/29 08:51, 5F
→
03/29 08:52, , 6F
03/29 08:52, 6F
→
03/29 08:53, , 7F
03/29 08:53, 7F
→
03/29 08:54, , 8F
03/29 08:54, 8F
→
03/29 08:54, , 9F
03/29 08:54, 9F
→
03/29 08:54, , 10F
03/29 08:54, 10F
推
03/29 08:54, , 11F
03/29 08:54, 11F
→
03/29 08:54, , 12F
03/29 08:54, 12F
→
03/29 08:55, , 13F
03/29 08:55, 13F
→
03/29 08:55, , 14F
03/29 08:55, 14F
→
03/29 08:56, , 15F
03/29 08:56, 15F
→
03/29 08:56, , 16F
03/29 08:56, 16F
→
03/29 08:56, , 17F
03/29 08:56, 17F
→
03/29 08:56, , 18F
03/29 08:56, 18F
→
03/29 08:57, , 19F
03/29 08:57, 19F
→
03/29 08:58, , 20F
03/29 08:58, 20F
推
03/29 08:58, , 21F
03/29 08:58, 21F
→
03/29 08:59, , 22F
03/29 08:59, 22F
→
03/29 08:59, , 23F
03/29 08:59, 23F
→
03/29 08:59, , 24F
03/29 08:59, 24F
→
03/29 09:00, , 25F
03/29 09:00, 25F
→
03/29 09:00, , 26F
03/29 09:00, 26F
→
03/29 09:01, , 27F
03/29 09:01, 27F
→
03/29 09:01, , 28F
03/29 09:01, 28F
→
03/29 09:02, , 29F
03/29 09:02, 29F
→
03/29 09:02, , 30F
03/29 09:02, 30F
→
03/29 09:02, , 31F
03/29 09:02, 31F
→
03/29 09:03, , 32F
03/29 09:03, 32F
→
03/29 09:03, , 33F
03/29 09:03, 33F
推
03/29 09:03, , 34F
03/29 09:03, 34F
→
03/29 09:03, , 35F
03/29 09:03, 35F
→
03/29 09:04, , 36F
03/29 09:04, 36F
→
03/29 09:04, , 37F
03/29 09:04, 37F
→
03/29 09:04, , 38F
03/29 09:04, 38F
→
03/29 09:04, , 39F
03/29 09:04, 39F
還有 73 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
03/29 09:43, , 113F
03/29 09:43, 113F
→
03/29 09:44, , 114F
03/29 09:44, 114F
推
03/29 09:44, , 115F
03/29 09:44, 115F
→
03/29 09:45, , 116F
03/29 09:45, 116F
推
03/29 09:45, , 117F
03/29 09:45, 117F
→
03/29 09:46, , 118F
03/29 09:46, 118F
→
03/29 09:46, , 119F
03/29 09:46, 119F
→
03/29 09:46, , 120F
03/29 09:46, 120F
→
03/29 09:46, , 121F
03/29 09:46, 121F
→
03/29 09:47, , 122F
03/29 09:47, 122F
→
03/29 09:47, , 123F
03/29 09:47, 123F
→
03/29 09:48, , 124F
03/29 09:48, 124F
→
03/29 09:48, , 125F
03/29 09:48, 125F
→
03/29 09:48, , 126F
03/29 09:48, 126F
推
03/29 09:49, , 127F
03/29 09:49, 127F
→
03/29 09:49, , 128F
03/29 09:49, 128F
推
03/29 09:50, , 129F
03/29 09:50, 129F
→
03/29 09:51, , 130F
03/29 09:51, 130F
→
03/29 09:51, , 131F
03/29 09:51, 131F
→
03/29 09:51, , 132F
03/29 09:51, 132F
推
03/29 09:53, , 133F
03/29 09:53, 133F
→
03/29 09:53, , 134F
03/29 09:53, 134F
→
03/29 09:58, , 135F
03/29 09:58, 135F
→
03/29 09:59, , 136F
03/29 09:59, 136F
推
03/29 10:03, , 137F
03/29 10:03, 137F
推
03/29 10:04, , 138F
03/29 10:04, 138F
推
03/29 10:05, , 139F
03/29 10:05, 139F
→
03/29 10:05, , 140F
03/29 10:05, 140F
→
03/29 10:06, , 141F
03/29 10:06, 141F
→
03/29 10:06, , 142F
03/29 10:06, 142F
→
03/29 10:11, , 143F
03/29 10:11, 143F
推
03/29 10:13, , 144F
03/29 10:13, 144F
→
03/29 10:14, , 145F
03/29 10:14, 145F
→
03/29 10:27, , 146F
03/29 10:27, 146F
→
03/29 10:35, , 147F
03/29 10:35, 147F
推
03/29 10:40, , 148F
03/29 10:40, 148F
推
03/29 13:01, , 149F
03/29 13:01, 149F
推
03/29 16:45, , 150F
03/29 16:45, 150F
→
03/29 17:59, , 151F
03/29 17:59, 151F
推
03/29 18:37, , 152F
03/29 18:37, 152F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
心得
28
152