[心得] 等等等等等一下!!請先別急著停止思考!
大家等等等等等一下!
請先別急著停止思考!!
若是沒有鷹派的強勢,哪能凸顯鴿派的差異?
鷹派的價值在於嚇阻對方,
鷹派的目的是在能提高對方接納鴿派的訴求。
鴿派的好,也就只有在鷹派出現後才會被人重視。
看看這兩人處理的差異....
王金平的立法院
江宜樺的行政院
同樣被學生佔領,卻是兩樣情。
鴿派的切割是為了不讓鷹派的犧牲沒價值,
府方才能有機會重新考慮鴿派的訴求。
而民眾對於兩個院長的處理方式所持態度,
就是鷹派想要達到的目的,為的是犧牲自己(鷹派攻政院那一方),
換取〔為何總統當初不聽立院學生訴求?〕,
換取〔江宜樺院長強勢手段所獲取的怨氣〕,希望最後能反噬總統府。
最最後,累積能量包圍總統府,換取城下之盟!!!
個人認為佔領行政院是必要的,因為台灣人民的暫存記憶體有限,
選在周日夜晚是因為,社會大眾所凝聚的能量又準備被政府的〔拖字訣〕
給磨耗殆盡,上班的上班,上課的上課....
我們靜下來想想洪下士虐死...想想大埔張藥房憤怒自縊...再想想核四議題.....
哪一次不是因為台灣人民太好騙、太好哄、太好河蟹掉呢?
基於天然呆的基因,所以學生幹部們才會走這險棋。
目的是希望能另闢新戰場,而立院這條壕溝不能棄守,雙雙施壓總統府,
學生佔領政院就是向總統的直屬打手(江院長)噴上血色標籤,
還能凸顯立院大家長(王院長)是屬於民眾這邊的(用不著他自己表態),
鷹派在政院的流血作為就會幫院長表態了。
最後希望,是時候給我們現場的學生力量了。不管是鴿派還是鷹派,都需要您的支持。
很怕大家急著停止思考,把自己鎖在〔絕對不能暴力的框架〕。那就未免太天真了。
〔不暴力抗爭〕只是眾多種訴求裡最容易凝聚民意的方式罷了。
好說歹說都講完的時候,就是執行力和意志力的實際貫徹了!
何況....到目前為止,我看到的是警盾砍腳,女學生慘叫、胖男眼鏡被踩爛喊著撿...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
我有個拜託
你今天晚上驅離學生時
不能流血
若有學生流血,我要跟你拼命。
傅斯年‧1949
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.233.40.123
推
03/24 02:28, , 1F
03/24 02:28, 1F
→
03/24 02:28, , 2F
03/24 02:28, 2F
推
03/24 02:29, , 3F
03/24 02:29, 3F
推
03/24 02:29, , 4F
03/24 02:29, 4F
推
03/24 02:29, , 5F
03/24 02:29, 5F
推
03/24 02:29, , 6F
03/24 02:29, 6F
推
03/24 02:29, , 7F
03/24 02:29, 7F
推
03/24 02:29, , 8F
03/24 02:29, 8F
→
03/24 02:29, , 9F
03/24 02:29, 9F
推
03/24 02:30, , 10F
03/24 02:30, 10F
推
03/24 02:30, , 11F
03/24 02:30, 11F
推
03/24 02:30, , 12F
03/24 02:30, 12F
推
03/24 02:30, , 13F
03/24 02:30, 13F
推
03/24 02:31, , 14F
03/24 02:31, 14F
推
03/24 02:31, , 15F
03/24 02:31, 15F
推
03/24 02:31, , 16F
03/24 02:31, 16F
→
03/24 02:31, , 17F
03/24 02:31, 17F
推
03/24 02:32, , 18F
03/24 02:32, 18F
→
03/24 02:32, , 19F
03/24 02:32, 19F
→
03/24 02:32, , 20F
03/24 02:32, 20F
推
03/24 02:33, , 21F
03/24 02:33, 21F
→
03/24 02:33, , 22F
03/24 02:33, 22F
推
03/24 02:33, , 23F
03/24 02:33, 23F
推
03/24 02:34, , 24F
03/24 02:34, 24F
推
03/24 02:34, , 25F
03/24 02:34, 25F
推
03/24 02:34, , 26F
03/24 02:34, 26F
推
03/24 02:34, , 27F
03/24 02:34, 27F
→
03/24 02:34, , 28F
03/24 02:34, 28F
→
03/24 02:35, , 29F
03/24 02:35, 29F
推
03/24 02:35, , 30F
03/24 02:35, 30F
推
03/24 02:36, , 31F
03/24 02:36, 31F
推
03/24 02:36, , 32F
03/24 02:36, 32F
→
03/24 02:37, , 33F
03/24 02:37, 33F
推
03/24 02:37, , 34F
03/24 02:37, 34F
推
03/24 02:37, , 35F
03/24 02:37, 35F
→
03/24 02:37, , 36F
03/24 02:37, 36F
→
03/24 02:37, , 37F
03/24 02:37, 37F
推
03/24 02:37, , 38F
03/24 02:37, 38F
推
03/24 02:37, , 39F
03/24 02:37, 39F
還有 21 則推文
→
03/24 02:45, , 61F
03/24 02:45, 61F
→
03/24 02:46, , 62F
03/24 02:46, 62F
推
03/24 02:47, , 63F
03/24 02:47, 63F
推
03/24 02:47, , 64F
03/24 02:47, 64F
推
03/24 02:47, , 65F
03/24 02:47, 65F
推
03/24 02:48, , 66F
03/24 02:48, 66F
推
03/24 02:48, , 67F
03/24 02:48, 67F
推
03/24 02:48, , 68F
03/24 02:48, 68F
推
03/24 02:48, , 69F
03/24 02:48, 69F
推
03/24 02:49, , 70F
03/24 02:49, 70F
推
03/24 02:52, , 71F
03/24 02:52, 71F
推
03/24 02:52, , 72F
03/24 02:52, 72F
推
03/24 02:52, , 73F
03/24 02:52, 73F
推
03/24 02:53, , 74F
03/24 02:53, 74F
推
03/24 02:53, , 75F
03/24 02:53, 75F
推
03/24 02:53, , 76F
03/24 02:53, 76F
推
03/24 02:55, , 77F
03/24 02:55, 77F
→
03/24 02:55, , 78F
03/24 02:55, 78F
推
03/24 02:57, , 79F
03/24 02:57, 79F
推
03/24 02:58, , 80F
03/24 02:58, 80F
推
03/24 02:59, , 81F
03/24 02:59, 81F
推
03/24 03:00, , 82F
03/24 03:00, 82F
推
03/24 03:02, , 83F
03/24 03:02, 83F
推
03/24 03:08, , 84F
03/24 03:08, 84F
推
03/24 03:08, , 85F
03/24 03:08, 85F
推
03/24 03:08, , 86F
03/24 03:08, 86F
噓
03/24 03:09, , 87F
03/24 03:09, 87F
→
03/24 03:10, , 88F
03/24 03:10, 88F
→
03/24 03:17, , 89F
03/24 03:17, 89F
推
03/24 03:22, , 90F
03/24 03:22, 90F
推
03/24 03:23, , 91F
03/24 03:23, 91F
推
03/24 03:32, , 92F
03/24 03:32, 92F
推
03/24 03:44, , 93F
03/24 03:44, 93F
推
03/24 03:52, , 94F
03/24 03:52, 94F
推
03/24 04:04, , 95F
03/24 04:04, 95F
推
03/24 04:04, , 96F
03/24 04:04, 96F
推
03/24 04:10, , 97F
03/24 04:10, 97F
推
03/24 06:44, , 98F
03/24 06:44, 98F
→
03/24 09:06, , 99F
03/24 09:06, 99F
推
03/24 13:48, , 100F
03/24 13:48, 100F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):