[閒聊] 對"謝謝你的溫柔"這首歌的看法
真的有點忍不住想講.......
就算會被轟也很想講.......
[謝謝你的溫柔]這首歌因為加了飛飛的男聲部分,
想來應該師姐迷跟五迷都會有...他們的意見。
我自己覺得最感到疑惑的是,飛飛他們唱得似乎很"用力",跟師姐們溫柔的聲音似乎...
不相容?(是版本不相容嗎?哈XD)
當然或許編曲者有他們的想法,其實我也覺得這樣很有創意,但是有些人可能就不喜歡,
不過我覺得這樣就說飛飛表現不夠好很不公平(當然會這樣說的大概不會是飛迷),因為
溫柔這首歌是五月天的,而五月天本來就是個樂團啊!我想原版的溫柔也有它特殊的樂
團風吧!這樣講不知道有沒有人聽得懂啊?反正樂團的歌是有其特殊之處,如果要給其
他人唱,是不是應該要重編一下啊?
(所以製作人!請問你在想什麼,可以告訴我們嗎?)
說真的,合音的部份我覺得很好聽,其他部分是見仁見智,然而我並不覺得他們唱得不
好,而是唱腔是否適合詮釋這首歌?
總歸一句話,我覺得飛飛因為這首歌被批可以料見,但我覺得是"非戰之罪",有時候我
覺得,公司是否應該要考慮更多一點?在編曲上應該更下功夫一點?
女聲部分溫柔,那男聲部分是否也要溫柔?如果是用力式的唱法,那編曲是否要改變來
符合這種情形呢?當然錄音時都是分開錄的,但是mixed在一起之後順耳不順耳是否也要
考慮一下?
唉,我覺得飛飛進步很多,但是別人可不這麼認為。
我只能說,飛飛們啊,你們的努力,有時候會有其他狀況發生,只要做到問心無愧
就好了,畢竟我們不能控制別人的想法啊。
五月天的歌,我最喜歡的就是"溫柔",本來還要編成手機鈴聲的,
所以身為飛寶,聽到這種情況也是很驚嚇......
華研你們可以多給飛飛們上課嗎?還有為他們量身打造歌嗎?
製作人可以多想想他們的唱腔是否適合某些歌嗎?
唉.......無奈.......。
(五迷SHE迷的心情都可以理解,我只想說,這不是飛飛們的錯Orz.)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.64.239.71
推
05/11 17:02, , 1F
05/11 17:02, 1F
推
05/11 17:21, , 2F
05/11 17:21, 2F
推
05/11 17:31, , 3F
05/11 17:31, 3F
推
05/11 17:59, , 4F
05/11 17:59, 4F
推
05/11 18:13, , 5F
05/11 18:13, 5F
→
05/11 18:14, , 6F
05/11 18:14, 6F
推
05/11 18:22, , 7F
05/11 18:22, 7F
推
05/11 18:23, , 8F
05/11 18:23, 8F
→
05/11 18:23, , 9F
05/11 18:23, 9F
→
05/11 18:24, , 10F
05/11 18:24, 10F
→
05/11 18:24, , 11F
05/11 18:24, 11F
推
05/11 18:35, , 12F
05/11 18:35, 12F
→
05/11 18:36, , 13F
05/11 18:36, 13F
→
05/11 18:37, , 14F
05/11 18:37, 14F
→
05/11 18:38, , 15F
05/11 18:38, 15F
→
05/11 19:01, , 16F
05/11 19:01, 16F
→
05/11 19:02, , 17F
05/11 19:02, 17F
→
05/11 19:03, , 18F
05/11 19:03, 18F
推
05/11 20:02, , 19F
05/11 20:02, 19F
→
05/11 20:03, , 20F
05/11 20:03, 20F
→
05/11 20:06, , 21F
05/11 20:06, 21F
推
05/11 21:23, , 22F
05/11 21:23, 22F
→
05/11 21:24, , 23F
05/11 21:24, 23F
→
05/11 21:24, , 24F
05/11 21:24, 24F
→
05/11 21:24, , 25F
05/11 21:24, 25F
→
05/11 21:24, , 26F
05/11 21:24, 26F
推
05/11 21:33, , 27F
05/11 21:33, 27F
推
05/11 21:35, , 28F
05/11 21:35, 28F
→
05/11 21:35, , 29F
05/11 21:35, 29F
→
05/11 21:35, , 30F
05/11 21:35, 30F
→
05/11 21:36, , 31F
05/11 21:36, 31F
推
05/11 21:58, , 32F
05/11 21:58, 32F
→
05/11 21:58, , 33F
05/11 21:58, 33F
→
05/11 21:58, , 34F
05/11 21:58, 34F
→
05/11 22:04, , 35F
05/11 22:04, 35F
推
05/11 23:08, , 36F
05/11 23:08, 36F
→
05/11 23:09, , 37F
05/11 23:09, 37F
→
05/11 23:10, , 38F
05/11 23:10, 38F
推
05/11 23:08, , 39F
05/11 23:08, 39F
還有 24 則推文
推
05/12 00:07, , 64F
05/12 00:07, 64F
→
05/12 00:08, , 65F
05/12 00:08, 65F
→
05/12 00:09, , 66F
05/12 00:09, 66F
→
05/12 00:08, , 67F
05/12 00:08, 67F
→
05/12 00:09, , 68F
05/12 00:09, 68F
→
05/12 00:11, , 69F
05/12 00:11, 69F
推
05/12 00:10, , 70F
05/12 00:10, 70F
→
05/12 00:12, , 71F
05/12 00:12, 71F
→
05/12 00:12, , 72F
05/12 00:12, 72F
推
05/12 00:13, , 73F
05/12 00:13, 73F
→
05/12 00:13, , 74F
05/12 00:13, 74F
→
05/12 00:13, , 75F
05/12 00:13, 75F
→
05/12 00:14, , 76F
05/12 00:14, 76F
→
05/12 00:16, , 77F
05/12 00:16, 77F
推
05/12 00:16, , 78F
05/12 00:16, 78F
推
05/12 00:17, , 79F
05/12 00:17, 79F
推
05/12 00:18, , 80F
05/12 00:18, 80F
→
05/12 00:19, , 81F
05/12 00:19, 81F
→
05/12 00:20, , 82F
05/12 00:20, 82F
推
05/12 00:23, , 83F
05/12 00:23, 83F
→
05/12 00:24, , 84F
05/12 00:24, 84F
推
05/12 00:27, , 85F
05/12 00:27, 85F
→
05/12 00:28, , 86F
05/12 00:28, 86F
推
05/12 00:28, , 87F
05/12 00:28, 87F
推
05/12 00:29, , 88F
05/12 00:29, 88F
推
05/12 00:31, , 89F
05/12 00:31, 89F
→
05/12 00:31, , 90F
05/12 00:31, 90F
→
05/12 00:33, , 91F
05/12 00:33, 91F
→
05/12 00:33, , 92F
05/12 00:33, 92F
推
05/12 00:37, , 93F
05/12 00:37, 93F
→
05/12 00:38, , 94F
05/12 00:38, 94F
→
05/12 00:59, , 95F
05/12 00:59, 95F
推
05/12 02:08, , 96F
05/12 02:08, 96F
推
05/12 02:44, , 97F
05/12 02:44, 97F
推
05/12 11:27, , 98F
05/12 11:27, 98F
推
05/12 13:55, , 99F
05/12 13:55, 99F
推
05/12 14:56, , 100F
05/12 14:56, 100F
推
05/13 01:35, , 101F
05/13 01:35, 101F
→
05/13 03:42, , 102F
05/13 03:42, 102F
→
05/13 03:43, , 103F
05/13 03:43, 103F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
閒聊
39
103