Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head:
=0A=0A--- Ven 29/6/12, George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> ha scritt=
o:=0A=0A> Da: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>=0A> Oggetto: Re: s=
vn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/=
common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/co=
ntrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c...=0A> A: pfg@freebsd.org=0A=
> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.o=
rg, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org=0A> Data: Venerd=EC 29 giugno 2012, 12:47=0A> =
=0A> On Jun 29, 2012, at 13:35 , Pedro Giffuni wrote:=0A> =0A> > (Sorry for=
top-posting]=0A> > =0A> > Actually ...=0A> > =0A> > David pointed out a fu=
ndamental flaw on my part.=0A> > =0A> > These are new files under a non-BSD=
license. Even when=0A> > they are only scripts used for testing I shouldn'=
t=0A> have=0A> > brought them in without -core approval.=0A> > =0A> > I wil=
l delete them right away and core shall decide=0A> > afterwards if and how =
they can be brought in.=0A> > =0A> =0A> Are the files under a CDDL license?=
=A0 Since that's the=0A> point of where you added them I don't think that t=
hat=0A> should be an issue.=A0 The issue comes when we might=0A> ship CDDL =
code by default, but these are tests and so that=0A> should not be a proble=
m.=0A> =0A=0AThey are under CDDL. I re-read the committer's guide and=0Athe=
y are right where they are.=0A=0ANow .. David pointed out I am not respecti=
ng the code=0Aprovenance since I didn't add them to the opensolaris=0Avendo=
r area, but these files are copyrighted Joyent=0AInc (not even Illumos) so =
I cannot put them there=0Aunless we create a new vendor for Joyent.=0A=0AAs=
George notes, they are only test files so we can=0Alive without them if th=
is is too much mess.=0A=0APedro.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 11 篇):