Re: UFS panic on Google Compute Engine

看板FB_stable作者時間12年前 (2014/01/10 19:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/13 (看更多)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/10/2014 08:07 AM, Bryan Venteicher wrote: > What happens when you try to portsnap fetch extract locally? I haven't Works without a problem. > I've been meaning to spin up some GCE instances to try out. I'll try > to get do that this weekend. That would be great. I've been using f1-micro instances. I've also seen timing problems when FreeBSD selects TSC as timecounter (the default). Time would run at 1/3 the normal speed, unless I switch to ACPI-safe, even though FreeBSD reports invariant TSC: kern.timecounter.invariant_tsc: 1 I wonder whether the latter is a KVM bug on Google's end. Julian --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlLP0c0ACgkQ2EtjUdW3H9lw8wCfReMQelx30K7rAF28clim8ApX Qn8An1iC3vEVMfLjNe2xJ+T5PUowIfwk =IHsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t--
文章代碼(AID): #1IpzBln0 (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1IpzBln0 (FB_stable)