Re: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'lis

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in
> 
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
> 
> (the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner per 
> provider; old output is retained as `list' command)
> 
> to at least stable/9 ?

If we agreed to merge, I would prefer to both stable/9 and 8 to have
divergence between branches as minimal as possible.

> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts 
> which one use in production.
> 
> If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny, 
> thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> [ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
Mikolaj Golub
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"