Re: Musings on ZFS Backup strategies

02.03.2013 03:12, David Magda:
>
> On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:55, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'm working with backups the same way, I wrote a simple script that synchronizes two filesystems between distant servers. I also use the same script to synchronize bushy filesystems (with hundred thousands of files) where rsync produces a too big load for synchronizing.
>>
>> https://github.com/kworr/zfSnap/commit/08d8b499dbc2527a652cddbc601c7ee8c0c23301
>
> There are quite a few scripts out there:
>
> 	http://www.freshports.org/search.php?query=zfs

A lot of them require python or ruby, and none of them manages 
synchronizing snapshots over network.

> For file level copying, where you don't want to walk the entire tree, here is the "zfs diff" command:
>
>> zfs diff [-FHt] snapshot [snapshot|filesystem]
>>
>> 	 Describes differences between a snapshot and a successor dataset. The
>> 	 successor dataset can be a later snapshot or the current filesystem.
>>
>> 	 The changed files are displayed including the change type. The change
>> 	 type is displayed useing a single character. If a file or directory
>> 	 was renamed, the old and the new names are displayed.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=zfs
>
> This allows one to get a quick list of files and directories, then use tar/rsync/cp/etc. to do the actual copy (where the destination does not have to be ZFS: e.g., NFS, ext4, Lustre, HDFS, etc.).

I know that but I see no reason in reverting to file-based synch if I 
can do block-based.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"