Re: Installing FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on IBM x3550 M3

看板FB_stable作者時間12年前 (2013/04/27 13:03), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串8/9 (看更多)
On 02/12/2013 02:59 AM, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:43:55AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Panagiotis Christias >> <p.christias@noc.ntua.gr> wrote: >>> >>> I suppose trying an 8.3 installation would be the easiest way to use MBR >>> instead of GPT, right; >> >> That would do it, but 9.1 is perfectly happy doing MBR. It's just not >> the default. >> >> Seems like many BIOSes assume that GPT=uEFI. Clearly this is silly, but... >> >> I know Lenovo laptops have this problem and it is VERY annoying. I run >> FreeBSD on a GPT disk on my ThinkPad, but I have booteasy installed on >> an MBR disk (which contains W7) and my BIOS is set to boot from that >> disk.BootEasy then will boot up the GPT disk with FreeBSD. > > Doesn't GPT start with an MBR covering the entire disk? How feasible would > it be to tweak that MBR so that a boot partition was listed in it? Say, a > partition holding the root filesystem could be listed in both the GPT and > MBR style. Then a disk could be booted with MBR or GPT at the whim of the > firmware. > > I agree that this BIOS=MBR/UEFI=GPT assumption is pure rubbish. I've got > machines with this documented restriction and I'd love a way around it. > It is feasible, it's known as a hybrid MBR. On Linux I've accomplished this using the gdisk utility, I don't know how it can be done on FreeBSD though. I had to use this ugly solution in order to install windows 8 on a GPT disk on a pc without UEFI support. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrm5TF (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrm5TF (FB_stable)