Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregati

看板FB_stable作者時間13年前 (2012/09/14 04:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/13 (看更多)
On 09/12/2012 10:51 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x. >>> >>> You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x >>> compared to < 9.0. >>> >> How do you determine that since it doesn't happen without lagg? I've no >> reports of igb hanging otherwise and its being used extensively. > > Well, I did say "seems to". :) > > igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0 > and 9-STABLE on those three boxes. > > igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if > non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just > the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode works (say failover) and > LACP mode doesn't, that "seems to" point to lagg. Sorry, forgot to mention it. I tried both failover and lacp: neither worked. The switch is a Dell powerconnect 6248 with ports configured for aggragation. I first tried on a 9.1 prerelease, then on a 9.0 release to have everything clean. In both ssh, both as server and as client, become unresponsive and unkillable. The problem might also lie within ssh/d, but I somehow doubt it. I haven't tried other network services. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1GKZj-wq (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 13 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1GKZj-wq (FB_stable)