Re: Clang as default compiler

>
>
> > in src.conf. No problem so far. However I wanted to avoid building base
> gcc
> > ( the whole collection ). Is  WITHOUT_GCC what I'm looking for?
> >
>
> It probably is. However, WITHOUT_GCC is not supported yet.
>
> > On another clang note: Is there a page specifying valid settings for
> > -march, my google-foo is failing me. Ie, I'm looking for the equivalent
> of
> >
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.htm
> > l#i386-and-x86_002d64-Options
> >
>
> Take a look at lines 120 and below of contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td in
> the FreeBSD source directory for supported march switches.
>

 >There is no specific PR.  We have not yet placed the requirement on our
 >ports maintainers to deal with clang.

Is there a time frame for this requirement?

And for the know broken ports, how are the users supposed to deal with them
until the ports is fixed? Modifying the port by hand in the local ports
tree?

Best regards
Andreas
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"