Re: Problem adding more than 8 network adapters

看板FB_stable作者時間13年前 (2012/08/30 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串8/9 (看更多)
Al 29/08/2012 16:16, En/na Andriy Gapon ha escrit: > on 29/08/2012 16:54 Gustau P矇rez i Querol said the following: >> Al 29/08/2012 15:30, En/na Andriy Gapon ha escrit: >>> I wonder where the discrepancy could come from. >>> Why would VirtualBox emulate the bridge differently for different OSes? >>> And I do not see any quirks related to bus numbers for this PCI ID in either >>> Linux, FreeBSD or lspci code... >>> >>> I think that output of lspci on FreeBSD could be interesting too (it's available >>> via sysutils/pciutils port). >>> >> The output of lspci gives the same info as pciconf. I'm attaching it however. > [snip] >> 00:18.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev f2) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode]) >> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 >> Bus: primary=01, secondary=01, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0 >> !!! Unknown I/O range types e0/df >> !!! Unknown memory range types f100/f0ff >> >> 00:19.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev f2) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode]) >> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 >> Bus: primary=02, secondary=02, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0 >> !!! Unknown I/O range types e0/df >> !!! Unknown memory range types f100/f0ff > I think that I was wrong with regard to Linux. I see that it does extensive > bridge reconfiguring if it notices any insanity. And I'd say that VirtualBix does > create an insane config here. > I believe that primary should be 0, secondary should be 1 and 2 respectively (as > they are) and subordinate should be equal to secondary. So primary bus numbers > and subordinate bus numbers are insane here. > I am not sure how much the incorrect bus numbers actually affect FreeBSD PCI-PCI > driver as it does not seem to use primary and subordinate numbers for anything > important. > > Memory and I/O misconfiguration are most likely much more important here. > > In any case, here is a link to the broken VirtualBox code: > http://www.virtualbox.org/svn/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/Bus/DevPciIch9.cpp > See function ich9pciInitBridgeTopology, which sets primary bus and secondary bus > to X and subordinate bus to X+1. > > And here a link to Linux code that re-configures those bus numbers: > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.5.3/drivers/pci/probe.c#L663 > > I bet that was "bus configuration invalid, reconfiguring" message during Linux boot. I did not see that message. Anyhow I found how to fix VBox to work as it should. I think I'm closing this thread and move it to @emulation. Gustau -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prou top-posting : http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting Stop top-posting : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style O O O Gustau P矇rez i Querol O O O Departament d'Enginyeria Telem쎠tica O O O Universitat Polit癡cnica de Catalunya Edifici C3 - Despatx S101-B UPC Campus Nord UPC C/ Jordi Girona, 1-3 08034 - Barcelona _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1GFbZVdB (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GFbZVdB (FB_stable)