Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

看板FB_stable作者時間13年前 (2012/08/29 18:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/16 (看更多)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF43D9C6B09CD2D4AB4838903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 29.08.2012 12:18 (localtime): > schrieb Pete French am 29.08.2012 11:38 (localtime): >>> Link aggregation can never work with two separate switches! LACP and >>> static trunking require both sides to bundle the same trunk. which is= >>> impossible for two separate switches. >> These switches had a port where you could connect them together and >> then configure each to know about the other switch, and to do LACP >> across the pair of them. Or at least thats what it looked like it >> was capable of doing, and it appeared to be doing LACP when configured= >> that way and connected to Windows machines, just not FreeBSD ones. But= I'm Have you checked that Windows really did LACP in your case? Sounds like it was no real hardware stack, so probably Windos just activated RSTP. FreeBSD doesn't detect any LACP/RSTP configuration features, but windows does with some NIC verndor's drivers. -Harry P.S.: Sorry for that additional answer, just forgot it in my last email. --------------enigF43D9C6B09CD2D4AB4838903 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlA97fEACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8gMgACgzrjGi0TNwuxFSZaAp07dGDhA EgEAmwYtrpmvKeSb9EMzoDDLvZK8LjTF =5bB2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF43D9C6B09CD2D4AB4838903--
文章代碼(AID): #1GFU-YSl (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GFU-YSl (FB_stable)