Re: Who is responsible for Heimdal/Kerberos in FreeBSD

看板FB_stable作者時間13年前 (2012/08/03 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/8 (看更多)
--Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 13:52:45 +0100 , Attila Bog=E1r wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm repeating my last month request. >=20 > Who is responsible for Heimdal/Kerberos or GSSAPI/NFS in FreeBSD? >=20 > I got a working NFSv3/Kerberos over UDP for EL6 nfs clients, but > suddenly I'm experiencing NFS I/O errors on high load/small files, > which I think are due to the buggy/old heimdal in FreeBSD. Rather than sending repeated mails to the list (which you've already seen get dropped on the floor), consider using the proper channels for reporting bugs. Send a PR. See http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html for more information. --=20 Thanks and best regards, Chris Nehren --Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQGpcIAAoJEB3ywRGrHAnQSgQP/jiIs5zIFVFScvHdkrgrV8hE bdAK2RqbSz72kJ097CB5HPDPYnTO+N4QOUYAtG7UPVq8+GnII4qC+KrGxAc6hf8o Hpy+6awVC19KFEegOMds1Vj+azlcI762Miup/MM7TjTuebPL05f+uBajSMLv3VEy 3QPQJcmrU6WCWZW+1okaB2czgYrPy9lj+sryKfIn33xxrnU9V7YZo3DU3pA76i46 1TjofFsTcNceoEeXpn64Emqs30KU+NtKcwhACr957CjYgtf8kcrpU1yN1a7nAWc7 ujxdsRd7E5KRbQ05kroOGKCrirjbYk9HrGUqttXy6FgQjHUh0j6a34TW7naS/9CW Yb1lRmSBhZlgO73/R2GEiZBuu1+c8GDrLGEfK+jC1nC7esgWGvixPPU3CONmvJtm CTCBOHktttiFC5IAOsFjc5Gjso+Z4YezCgq8zXMDQpBezJGC6ipawxi5rlU6v3Sn LAf3JeKr9ueAqTXpKecG5yEtJ7tk/e8Lkcf/Bj6oigcfi+eRYQpL95bzS6SYsRrX MWLklQlxsYnPaEkJnZkiv41zpUsIbwY6CLwUGDudjv8oPOobHzPNtkSGtYSjeL2y IbkDnQxMLO3ubG8cOswKm1xY0Y1CRm096ZdMnp7iGaM67a1ZYAwfLO8pGJMH2JJn FI1yKK1hz7bKFlvzYqxc =RZBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT--
文章代碼(AID): #1G6i1V_D (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1G6i1V_D (FB_stable)