Re: zfs, 1 gig of RAM and periodic weekly

看板FB_stable作者時間14年前 (2012/02/28 12:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串10/16 (看更多)
Hi. On 28.02.2012 01:02, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > regardless of the pool size ? > > I was planning on making an atom board a file server for my home, and I have two options: soekris > net6501 2GB RAM and intel board powered by the 330 atom (says 2GB limited as well). My plans are > to use from 4 up to 8 disks, and they should be 2TB at least. > > As its for home use, some p2p software and mostly music listening and sometimes movie streaming. > > should 2GB be that bad, that I should drop it and use UFS instead ? > > I may run any version of FreeBSD on it, was planning on 9-STABLE or 9.1. > In the same time I have a couple of hosts successfully running zfs on 768 Megs and on 1 Gig of RAM. Both i386. And they aren't affected by the periodic weekly for some reason. And they are used only as fileservers. So when I see all these advices to add a gazillion gigabytes of RAM to use zfs - I don't see the connection. Eugene. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1FJ5Z3pm (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FJ5Z3pm (FB_stable)