Re: Reducing the need to compile a custom kernel

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I want to note here: the pf ALTQ options are a pain in the butt, quite
> honestly.  I've found in the past that removing the ones you don't use
> won't result in a successful build, thus one must include them all.  We
> do need ALTQ support though, for rate-limiting capability.  The NOPCC
> option is needed for SMP builds, which makes me wonder what the state of
> SMP is in this regard -- meaning, on non-SMP builds, is it still safe
> to include ALTQ_NOPCC?

It seems like I'm missing something. What is good about using non-SMP 
kernel?

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"