Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

We have tried POLLING here on Intel cards attached to the igb driver
(see my post entitled "High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance"
from 27/01/2011".

This broke carp *badly* and we switched back to interrupts.

You say a single thread eats up a full CPU core, can you post a top to
show the %interrupt and your smb process' usage ?

On 2/1/11 10:28 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I don't test POLLING, sounds like its broken, I don't understand
> why you think you need you need it?  This hardware supports
> MSI why not use it?
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> 2011/1/31 Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>
> 
>> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
>> You wrote 1 冫貥賻턠2011 윮, 10:24:16:
>>
>>>   And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver
>>> this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but
>>> seems, that problem is not fixed completely.
>>   I forgot to give one last pice of information: POLLING is in action.
>> Without it single thread copy from this server via SMB eats one core
>> of CPU completely.
>>
>> --
>> // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"